ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
Utility of enhanced quantitative urine culture technique for isolation of uro-pathogens in children.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are the most common bacterial infection worldwide. Symptoms of UTI in children is vague & non-specific and mostly underdiagnosed Standard urine culture (SUC) is the gold standard for detecting uropathogens but the clinical correlation and its implication in initiating antimicrobial therapy continue to be a question for decision-making. Enhanced quantitative urine culture (EQUC) was developed to overcome these limitations. However, its utility to diagnose paediatric UTI has not been well explored, necessitating the need for new diagnostic methods. The study was conducted to evaluate the utility of EQUC for isolation of bacterial uropathogens in children. Method: A prospective observation study was conducted and urine samples were collected and processed using both SUC and EQUC techniques. Microbial identification was performed using phenotypic characteristics and biochemical tests. VITEK 2 SYSTEM was used for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing whenever required. Results: A total of 156 samples were collected from 84 patients and subjected to SUC and EQUC techniques. SUC identified 50 positive samples (32.05%), while EQUC identified 87 positive samples (55.7%). EQUC recovered 25% more organisms compared to SUC. Escherichia coli was the most common organism isolated in both the techniques. Management of patients considering EQUC results showed better recovery in all age groups especially for midstream urine. Conclusion: The EQUC technique demonstrated higher recovery rates of uro-pathogens compared to the SUC, making it a valuable tool for diagnosing paediatric UTIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.