ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
Food label literacy and its determinants among residents of Bathinda city: A mixed methods study.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Food labels are one of the most important and direct means of communicating information to consumers about food products. Materials and Methods: It was a mixed methods study conducted among 162 consumers in 15 supermarkets of Bathinda city using a pretested structured questionnaire regarding food label literacy and determinants of food choices of consumers of supermarkets. This information was triangulated with qualitative data obtained by conducting in-depth interviews with 12 participants. The suitability of the data for the application of factor analysis was confirmed, and nine factors were obtained that explained 79.51% of variance according to the inflection point of the scree plot. Results: It was observed that most of the consumers (often 39.5%, sometimes 35.8%) read nutrition facts labels when buying prepackaged food. 24.7% 'rarely or never' paid attention to food labels. Professionals and semiprofessionals were more frequent food-label readers than other occupational categories. This difference was statistically significant. Multivariate analysis revealed that unskilled workers were not able to comprehend the information about added sugar and sodium. Label reading increased with educational status, with the majority of professionals reading the food labels, and the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion: People found it difficult to comprehend nutrition information, so there is a need to create public awareness on various components of food labels so as to increase the utilization of information given on food labels and encourage healthy food consumption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.