ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
Comprehensive statistical analysis of serum interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein for early diagnosis of severe acute pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cell death and its interaction with mitochondrial dysfunction in pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis: a comprehensive review.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026Review
- Significance of innate immune surveillance in emphysematous pancreatitis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Interpretable XGBoost-SHAP model predicts short-term recurrence after first-episode acute pancreatitis.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) is a life-threatening condition requiring early diagnosis for timely intervention. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a pro-inflammatory cytokine that rises earlier in response to inflammation. C-reactive protein (CRP) is commonly used but has limited early diagnostic accuracy. This meta-analysis aims to head-to-head compare the diagnostic accuracy of IL-6 and CRP for early SAP diagnosis. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases for relevant studies published until June 2024. We included those observational studies that reported the sensitivity and specificity of IL-6 and CRP for early SAP diagnosis. We compared the predictive accuracy of IL-6 versus CRP using pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and summary receiver operating characteristics area under the curve (SROC AUC). Heterogeneity was assessed using I Results: Meta-analysis included 17 studies with 1517 patients diagnosed with AP, of which 496 had SAP. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR, and SROC AUC of IL-6 were 86%, 81%, 25, and 0.90, respectively, while for CRP, they were 75%, 75%, 9, and 0.81, respectively. The comparative predictive accuracy of IL-6 versus CRP showed a significant difference in pooled sensitivity ( Conclusion: IL-6 shows greater diagnostic accuracy than CRP for early SAP diagnosis. IL-6 can be considered both an early diagnostic and follow-up biomarker for AP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.