ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
Gynaecological oncology services: A qualitative exploration of womens' perspectives at a teaching hospital in North East India.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gynaecological malignancies pose a significant health concern in Northeastern region of India with poor survival rates often linked to limited awareness and/or delayed diagnosis. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of indigenous women in state of Assam regarding their gynecological cancer care seeking practices. Methods: This descriptive, qualitative study was conducted among 15 women attending the Obstetrics and Gynaecology Out Patient Department of a teaching hospital. Participants were purposively identified to ensure diverse perspectives. Semi-structured interviews highlighted their experiences with gynecological care. Interviews were continued until data saturation was achieved. These were transcribed verbatim, translated, coded, and analyzed thematically. Results: Study participants were aged between 25 and 60 years. Identified themes were the lack of awareness, family support and open communication with family and healthcare providers. Most were not aware of gynecological malignancies and available screening facilities. Lack of privacy and embarrassment of gynecological examination were perceived barriers to care seeking. Low prioritization of one's health, lack of autonomy and financial dependence on the spouse were personal level barriers. Fear of being diagnosed with cancer compounded by lack of information from hard-pressed healthcare providers also hindered early help seeking. Participants also preferred a female gynecologist for management of gynaecological malignancies. Conclusion: Lack of awareness and perceived barriers to early care seeking for gynaecological malignancies should be addressed to prevent cancer, ensure early detection and prompt treatment among indigenous women. These findings could be applied to improve the patient-centeredness of care facilitating timely and high-quality treatment for these malignancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.