Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40814439›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Center2025

Real-world effectiveness of goserelin 10.8-mg compared to goserelin 3.6-mg in premenopausal and perimenopausal Chinese patients with hormone receptor positive breast cancer: a cohort study.

Yongsheng Wang, Xi Wang, Jiong Wu, Hong Liu, Jiuda Zhao, Jian Huang, Jianxia Liu, Youling Gong, Hao Wang, Huaqing Yang and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Center, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05184257 (The Effectiveness of Zoladex® 10.8 mg Compared to Zoladex® 3.6mg in the Treatment of Premenopausal and Perimenopausal Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05184257 completednot on this map

The Effectiveness of Zoladex® 10.8 mg Compared to Zoladex® 3.6mg in the Treatment of Premenopausal and Perimenopausal Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer: A Real-World Study

TypeobservationalSponsorAstraZenecaRan2022 to 2023Enrolled1,176ConditionsBreast Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Yongsheng WangBreast Cancer Center, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, China.
Xi WangDepartment of Breast Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Jiong WuDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Hong LiuDepartment of Breast Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Jiuda ZhaoBreast Cancer Center, Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, China.
Jian HuangDepartment of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Jianxia LiuDepartment of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Youling GongDepartment of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Hao WangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Huaqing YangDepartment of Oncology, Guangyuan Central Hospital, Guangyuan, China.
Guorong ZouDepartment of Oncology, Guangzhou Panyu Central Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Quchang OuyangDepartment of Breast Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China.
Guoqin JiangDepartment of Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Huijuan LiuDepartment of Breast Oncology, Shanxi Cancer Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Sujie NiDepartment of Oncology and Chemotherapy, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Binghe XuDepartment of Oncology and Internal Medicine, Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jinming YuProton Center, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Few studies compared the effectiveness of the 3-monthly goserelin 10.8-mg and the monthly 3.6-mg depot in inducing ovarian function suppression for premenopausal patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer. We conducted a large-scale real-world study (RWS) in China to validate the non-inferiority of goserelin 10.8-mg to the 3.6-mg depot. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective-prospective, non-inferiority study compared goserelin 10.8-mg with 3.6-mg in suppressing estradiol (E2) levels in premenopausal and perimenopausal patients with HR+ breast cancer. Eligible patients were identified, and their demographic and clinical data were obtained from hospital medical records. The observation period was 28 weeks. Propensity score matching (PSM) ensured baseline comparability. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with E2 suppression to postmenopausal level at Week 12±4. Difference in proportions and 95 % CI was calculated by Newcombe-Wilson score method. The non-inferiority margin was -10 %. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses assessed result robustness. Results: From 1st January, 2015 to 15th December, 2023, 15,629 patients from 16 hospitals nationwide were screened, with 1,060 eligible patients included in the full analysis set (3.6-mg group: 678; 10.8-mg group: 382). Post-PSM, the primary endpoint was analyzed in 590 patients (295 in each group). At Week 12±4, the proportion of patients with E2 suppression was 99.1 % (95 % CI: 96.9 %-99.8 %) for goserelin 10.8-mg and 95.3 % (95 % CI: 91.0 %-97.6 %) for goserelin 3.6-mg. The difference was 3.8 % (95 % CI: 0.6 %-8.1 %) with the lower limit of 95 % CI greater than the non-inferiority margin. All subgroup analyses, including those based on age (≤45 or >45 years) and previous chemotherapy (yes/no), and all sensitivity analyses on the primary endpoint were consistent with the main analysis. Conclusions: This RWS validated the non-inferiority of goserelin 10.8-mg 3-monthly to 3.6-mg monthly in Chinese patients with HR+ breast cancer, where high E2 suppression rates were achieved in both goserelin dosage groups. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05184257).

Indexed as

Breast cancerEstradiolGonadotropin-releasing hormoneGoserelinPremenopausal period

Identifiers

PMID40814439
PMCPMC12347140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.