ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2025
Race and "omic" data in glioma: A systematic review of contemporary research to explore the digital divide.
Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Glioblastoma: current challenges and future horizons.Singapore medical journal · 2026Article
- Recurrent Limitations of CAR-T Therapy in Gliomas: Evidence from Preclinical and Phase I Clinical Studies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The expanding repertoire of studies generating genome-scale omic datasets from glioma samples provides a generational opportunity to uncover mechanisms driving aggressive biology and develop new treatments. However, ensuring such studies reflect the breadth of racial groups and ethnicities affected by gliomas is critical to support equity in future therapeutic advances. We therefore report a contemporary snapshot of the representation of race and ethnicity in omic glioma studies. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus and systematically reviewed articles published between January and November 2023 reporting de novo genome-scale sequencing data generated using samples from patients diagnosed with glioma (according to World Health Organization 2021 criteria) to characterize the reporting and composition of race and ethnicity data. Results: Thirty-five studies involving 5601 patients were analyzed. Race or ethnicity data was reported in only 3 studies (8.6%), of which none provided omic data in a format that could be stratified by race or ethnicity. Reporting varied by continent with all 3 studies including race or ethnicity data based in North America. Where racial data was available, we found that samples used for genome-scale characterization came from patients reported as being White in 91.1% cases (41 patients), with 6.7% (3 patients) reported as Black and 2.2% (1 patient) as Hispanic. Conclusions: These studies underscore an urgent need for improved reporting and representation to enhance our understanding of glioma biology across different populations and guide targeted initiatives from policymakers and funders to support equitable improvements in healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.