Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40814428›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2025

Race and "omic" data in glioma: A systematic review of contemporary research to explore the digital divide.

Olaoluwa Ezekiel Dada, Zvipo Chisango, Kwadwo Antwi Boasiako Nkansah-Poku, Mareshah N Sowah, Amanda Cyntia Lima Fonseca Rodrigues, Olivia Duru, Matthew Myers, Sophie T Williams, Shungu Ushewokunze, Spencer J Collis and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Olaoluwa Ezekiel DadaCollege of Medicine, University College Hospital Ibadan, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8920-9449
Zvipo ChisangoEmory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Kwadwo Antwi Boasiako Nkansah-PokuCollege of Health Sciences, University of Ghana Medical School, College of Health Sciences, Accra, Ghana.
Mareshah N SowahUniversity of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, Greenville, South Carolina, USA.
Amanda Cyntia Lima Fonseca RodriguesDepartment of Neurology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Olivia DuruThe Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Matthew MyersDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Sophie T WilliamsWeston Park Cancer Centre, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Shungu UshewokunzeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Spencer J CollisDivision of Clinical Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Nathan A ShlobinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute of New York, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Sylvester OmoruyiSchool of Anatomical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Ola RominiyiDivision of Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9724-0224

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The expanding repertoire of studies generating genome-scale omic datasets from glioma samples provides a generational opportunity to uncover mechanisms driving aggressive biology and develop new treatments. However, ensuring such studies reflect the breadth of racial groups and ethnicities affected by gliomas is critical to support equity in future therapeutic advances. We therefore report a contemporary snapshot of the representation of race and ethnicity in omic glioma studies. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus and systematically reviewed articles published between January and November 2023 reporting de novo genome-scale sequencing data generated using samples from patients diagnosed with glioma (according to World Health Organization 2021 criteria) to characterize the reporting and composition of race and ethnicity data. Results: Thirty-five studies involving 5601 patients were analyzed. Race or ethnicity data was reported in only 3 studies (8.6%), of which none provided omic data in a format that could be stratified by race or ethnicity. Reporting varied by continent with all 3 studies including race or ethnicity data based in North America. Where racial data was available, we found that samples used for genome-scale characterization came from patients reported as being White in 91.1% cases (41 patients), with 6.7% (3 patients) reported as Black and 2.2% (1 patient) as Hispanic. Conclusions: These studies underscore an urgent need for improved reporting and representation to enhance our understanding of glioma biology across different populations and guide targeted initiatives from policymakers and funders to support equitable improvements in healthcare.

Indexed as

diversity and inclusion (EDI)equalityethnicitygliomaomicsrace

Identifiers

PMID40814428
PMCPMC12349769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.