ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2025
Survival, quality of life, and motor function in brain metastases surgery: The role of complete resection.
Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Treatment modalities in recurrent brain metastases: a combined institutional and individual patient data meta-analysis of post-recurrence survival and local progression-free survival.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Baseline Graded Prognostic Assessment Is Associated with Postoperative Health-Related Quality of Life Recovery After Brain Metastasis Resection: A Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Living with brain metastases-A longitudinal qualitative study of patient experiences from time of diagnosis.Neuro-oncology practice · 2026Article
- A comparative review of economic evaluations for immune checkpoint inhibitors in early stage and advanced stage cancer: focusing on pembrolizumab.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: One in 3 patients with advanced cancer develops brain metastases. Surgical resection of brain metastases is done in 15%-20% of these patients. While gross total resection (GTR) is believed to extend overall survival (OS), concerns exist regarding increased morbidity. This study examines the impact of surgical resection, particularly GTR, on self-reported symptoms, focusing on quality of life (QoL) and motor dysfunction. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study involving adult patients undergoing surgical resection for brain metastases from solid tumors in a defined region of Norway between 2017 and 2021. Clinical data were collected at inclusion prior to surgery and every 3 months the first year. Patients completed monthly questionnaires assessing QoL and motor dysfunction. QoL was measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C15-PAL, while motor dysfunction was evaluated using the EORTC QLQ-BN20. Results: A total of 155 patients were included and median OS was 13 months. GTR was achieved in 69 (44%) patients and was associated with longer median OS compared to subtotal resection (17.7 vs. 10.9 months, Conclusion: Self-reported QoL is maintained after surgery for brain metastases. Complete resection is associated with extended OS without compromising self-reported motor function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.