Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40814419›Full record

ReviewNeuro-oncology practice2025

Screening for brain metastases in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and an actionable genomic alteration: A structured literature review.

Jarno W J Huijs, Martina Bortolot, Anna S Berghoff, Priscilla K Brastianos, Juliette H R J Degens, Dirk K M De Ruysscher, Annette Compter, Lizza E L Hendriks

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuro-oncology practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jarno W J HuijsDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, GROW - Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9117-6885
Martina BortolotDepartment of Medicine (DMED), University of Udine, Udine, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1364-5478
Anna S BerghoffDepartment of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9379-6797
Priscilla K BrastianosDepartment of Medicine, Divisions of Hematology/Oncology and Neuro-Oncology, Mass General Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4470-8425
Juliette H R J DegensDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, the Netherlands.
Dirk K M De RuysscherDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Annette CompterDepartment of Neuro-oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9732-2150
Lizza E L HendriksDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, GROW - Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3521-2535

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Brain metastases (BM) frequently occur in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with actionable genomic alterations (AGA). Targeted therapies (TTs) improve outcomes, but differences in BM screening and eligibility criteria across trials make comparisons challenging. While stage IV NSCLC guidelines recommend BM screening, it is not mandatory, and imaging techniques vary. Methods: Registrational and phase II/III trials of FDA/EMA-approved TTs for advanced NSCLC with AGA, published since 2012, were included. Main focus of the review was evaluation of baseline brain screening practices across trials. Information on BM follow-up, BM incidence, and BM-related outcomes was retrieved. Results: Of 51 trials, 71% mandated baseline BM screening, and 27% mandated follow-up imaging for all patients. MRI was specified for BM assessment in 31% of the trials. BM incidence at baseline was high, up to 40% in the first-line setting. While most trials included patients with BM, eligibility criteria varied, and 43% of trials prespecified BM-related outcomes; 56% of phase III trials used BM as a stratification factor. Conclusion: This review highlights the increasing attention to BM screening in NSCLC TT trials. However, substantial heterogeneity remains in BM eligibility, screening, outcomes, and follow-up. Standardizing these aspects in future trials is essential.

Indexed as

actionable genomic alterationsbrain metastasesMRINSCLCscreening

Identifiers

PMID40814419
PMCPMC12349771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.