ReviewNeuro-oncology practice2025
Screening for brain metastases in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and an actionable genomic alteration: A structured literature review.
Review in Neuro-oncology practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Brain metastasis in stage IV lung adenocarcinoma is frequently missed by symptom-based screening.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Brain metastases (BM) frequently occur in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with actionable genomic alterations (AGA). Targeted therapies (TTs) improve outcomes, but differences in BM screening and eligibility criteria across trials make comparisons challenging. While stage IV NSCLC guidelines recommend BM screening, it is not mandatory, and imaging techniques vary. Methods: Registrational and phase II/III trials of FDA/EMA-approved TTs for advanced NSCLC with AGA, published since 2012, were included. Main focus of the review was evaluation of baseline brain screening practices across trials. Information on BM follow-up, BM incidence, and BM-related outcomes was retrieved. Results: Of 51 trials, 71% mandated baseline BM screening, and 27% mandated follow-up imaging for all patients. MRI was specified for BM assessment in 31% of the trials. BM incidence at baseline was high, up to 40% in the first-line setting. While most trials included patients with BM, eligibility criteria varied, and 43% of trials prespecified BM-related outcomes; 56% of phase III trials used BM as a stratification factor. Conclusion: This review highlights the increasing attention to BM screening in NSCLC TT trials. However, substantial heterogeneity remains in BM eligibility, screening, outcomes, and follow-up. Standardizing these aspects in future trials is essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.