ReviewNeuro-oncology practice2025
Measures of physical functioning in adults with brain tumor associated with functional outcomes: A scoping review.
Review in Neuro-oncology practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuro-oncology researchers and clinicians rely mostly on subjective measures to evaluate physical functioning (PF) and predict survival in primary brain tumor (PBT) patients. Exploring alternative clinical outcome assessment (COA) measures may identify more objective measures that better quantify PF in PBT patients. A scoping review was conducted to identify studies related to PF measures used in PBT patients. Using the PRISMA-SCRA guideline 3 databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) were searched on January 25, 2024. Reviewers performed an independent review of titles, abstracts, and full text using covidence systematic review software and a standardized Microsoft Excel form for extracting data. 1093 publications were identified; 49 studies met eligibility criteria. Studies used a variety of PF measures evaluated at different time points, ranging from preintervention to 3 years or more postintervention. 39 PF COA measures were identified. Of the 39, 3 clinician-reported measures (ClinRO) [KPS, ECOG, and FIM] are validated for PBT. Many measures found are standardized for other neurological diseases including performance (PerfO) and patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. Validation of additional COA types (PerfO and PRO) that are complementary to the ClinRO measures already validated for the PBT population should be established. Measures of interest should include the evaluation of walking due to its clinical relevance and indication for overall PF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.