Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40814410›Full record

ArticleBioscience2025

US Imperiled species and the five drivers of biodiversity loss.

Talia E Niederman, Julianne N Aronson, Alison M Gainsbury, Laura A Nunes, Lindsay M Dreiss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Talia E NiedermanCenter for Conservation Innovation, Defenders of Wildlife, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5201-2386
Julianne N AronsonCenter for Conservation Innovation, Defenders of Wildlife, Washington, DC, United States.
Alison M GainsburyCenter for Conservation Innovation, Defenders of Wildlife, Washington, DC, United States.
Laura A NunesCenter for Conservation Innovation, Defenders of Wildlife, Washington, DC, United States.
Lindsay M DreissCenter for Conservation Innovation, Defenders of Wildlife, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8167-0812

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We synthesized reported threats to US imperiled species to identify which of the five predominant drivers of biodiversity loss-climate change, invasive species, land and sea use change, pollution, and overexploitation-negatively influence species persistence across taxa. Using threats identified at listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) assessments, and novel climate sensitivity assessments, we document which drivers affect the 2766 imperiled species analyzed. Our results are the first in which climate change has been identified as the leading threat to species listed under the ESA. We found that updated climate sensitivity assessments are essential for understanding the breadth of this threat. We also show that the majority of US imperiled species experience multiple threats, with some groups such as cnidarians, bivalves, and amphibians facing a higher total number than average. As climate change rapidly accelerates, we emphasize the need for up-to-date assessments and highlight existing data gaps.

Indexed as

biodiversity lossclimate changeconservationendangered speciesimperiled species

Identifiers

PMID40814410
PMCPMC12345630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.