ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Project BREATHE: A Quality Improvement Initiative.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Asthma is the most common chronic illness in pediatrics, placing a significant burden on patients and the healthcare system. The lack of standardization in screening, diagnosis, and treatment remains a key challenge in pediatric asthma management. This project used the Project BREATHE toolkit, supplied through the New York State Department of Health, to implement a care process for children with asthma receiving care at our institution. Our primary objective was to enhance asthma care through a quality improvement framework to optimize outcomes and reduce healthcare usage. Methods: Following identifying key drivers contributing to suboptimal asthma care in our region, our transdisciplinary team developed a standardized asthma care process. From July 2020 to June 2021, the process was systematically applied to all patients admitted with a diagnosis of asthma. Control charts were reviewed monthly to assess adherence and uptake of care process components, facilitating continuous quality improvement and data-driven modifications. Results: Following implementation, inhaled corticosteroid prescriptions increased from 50% to 81%, whereas subspecialist consults rose from 8.3% to 77%. The proportion of patients receiving asthma severity assessments ranged from 71% to 90%, and the rates of asthma education fluctuated from 50% to 89%. Additionally, the rate of emergency department visits declined from 5.2% to 4.7% and hospitalizations from 12.7% to 10.1% following implementation. Conclusions: Implementing a transdisciplinary asthma care process resulted in sustained improvements in asthma management and reduced asthma-related emergency department visits and hospitalizations. These findings highlight the effectiveness of a structured, team-based approach in optimizing pediatric asthma care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.