ReviewAnnals of pediatric cardiology
Viral myocarditis in pediatrics: A review of current diagnostic methods and future directions.
Review in Annals of pediatric cardiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of triglyceride-glucose index on short-term prognosis in patients with acute myocarditis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Efficacy of Intravenous Immunoglobulin and Corticosteroids in Pediatric Myocarditis: A Comprehensive Prospective Analysis from a Middle Eastern Tertiary Care Center.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Precision immunomodulation of viral myocarditis: a spatiotemporal intervention paradigm based on smart biomaterials.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Viral myocarditis is the inflammation of heart myocytes resulting from viral infection. Incidence in the pediatric population could reach 2 per 100,000 per year, and COVID-19 infection is a significant risk factor, which increases the possibility of having an infection by 40 times. Early detection results in catching the disease early and consequently improves outcomes. Clinical presentation of viral myocarditis in children could vary from mild prodromal symptoms to severe heart failure. Clinical examination, electrocardiogram, and chest X-ray may give clues for physiological and structural signs usually associated with the disease. However, they are inconclusive as they lack both accuracy and specificity. Biomarkers used to track the disease usually lack sensitivity and specificity. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is the imaging of choice to diagnose viral myocarditis by showing edema and late gadolinium enhancement. Point-of-care ultrasound has been approved as a good imaging method for early detection. It can be used as an effective screening tool for high-risk patients. Positron emission tomography scan is very sensitive in detecting disease early in its acute phase, especially if combined with CMR. All imaging studies are prone to interpretation bias, leading to a misdiagnosis. Endomyocardial biopsy is the gold standard method for diagnosis. However, it is time-consuming and ineffective as an early detection tool. Artificial intelligence (AI) helps with interpretation, decreasing bias, improving accuracy, and saving time and manpower. With more research and evidence, adopting AI-based methods to diagnose myocarditis in pediatrics could offer early detection, reduce costs, and save time for early intervention. Genetics helps identify inflammatory pathways involved in vulnerable patients, and genetic therapy may suppress disease progression by mitigating these pathways. Research focused on children is highly encouraged, and collaboration between healthcare institutions to develop telemedicine-based programs is influential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.