Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40814254›Full record

ArticleACS synthetic biology2025

Critical Analysis of Preprints and Inquiry-Based Lessons Improve the Synthetic Biology Learning Experience.

Guillermo Nevot, Marc Güell, Javier Santos-Moreno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS synthetic biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Guillermo NevotDepartment of Medicine and Life Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08003 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7015-0942
Marc GüellDepartment of Medicine and Life Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08003 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4000-7912
Javier Santos-MorenoDepartment of Medicine and Life Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08003 Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic biology is a transformative field crucial to address global challenges. It is highly interdisciplinary, integrating different subjects beyond biology. Therefore, traditional lecture-based teaching methods often fall short in effectively covering the diverse and rapidly evolving advancements in synthetic biology. We developed active learning workflows for complementing classic theoretical lectures in universities to improve the synthetic biology learning experience. We used preprints as an educational resource for the students to critically analyze differences comparing manuscripts and the final published work. In addition, we designed a practical laboratory session where students had to infer the logic behind CRISPRi-based gene circuits that they assembled, thus engaging with every step of the design-build-test-learn cycle. Following these activities, 90% of the students reported having improved critical analysis skills and 80% felt that they had learned a wide range of synthetic biology concepts. These approaches demonstrate the potential of innovative teaching for synthetic biology, which helps students with both technical and soft skills at the same time and has the potential to be adapted to other fields.

Indexed as

Problem-Based LearningSynthetic BiologyCRISPR-Cas SystemsHumansStudentsUniversitiesactive learningcollaborative learningCRISPRiEducationpreprintssynthetic biology

Identifiers

PMID40814254
PMCPMC12362600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.