ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2025
Prehospital critical care dispatch: a scoping review (PHASE).
Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced resuscitative interventions in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective cohort study of a physician-led pre-hospital team.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Emotional distress of callers requesting emergency medical communication center assistance and patient outcomes: a prospective observational study.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPrehospital critical care (PHCC) dispatch is a vital component of emergency medical services, aiming to allocate specialised resources for critically ill or injured patients in out-of-hospital settings. This scoping review examines the existing evidence on optimising PHCC dispatch, identifies research gaps, and highlights priorities for future investigation.
methodsA systematic search of databases including CINAHL, PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL from January 2004 to October 2024. We included all study types, focusing on the dispatch of PHCC assets globally.
resultsThe search yielded 39 studies that met the inclusion criteria. The included studies varied in design, setting and focus (e.g. Traumatic vs. Medical aetiology). Outcomes measured ranged across dispatch factors, physiological and temporal variables, with advanced intervention and survival metrics commonly used to asses dispatch effectiveness. DISCUSSION: The review found variability in dispatch models, staffing, and outcome measures. Most studies focused on HEMS and P-HEMS, often using injury mechanisms and physiological parameters as dispatch criteria. However, their predictive accuracy is inconsistent, especially for older trauma patients. Clinician involvement improves accuracy, but the role of cognitive tools needs more study. Challenges include ethical and logistical issues in prospective studies, limited research in low- and middle-income countries, and lack of harmonised datasets for missed dispatch opportunities. Technologies like automated crash notifications and real-time video show promise but need more development validation.
conclusionThis review underscores the need for robust, prospective research to refine dispatch criteria and integrate advanced technologies. Addressing these gaps could improve resource allocation, reduce over- and under-triage, and ultimately enhance patient outcomes in PHCC systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.