Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40814107›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Instruments for measuring head nurses' competencies in a hospital setting: a scoping review.

Lukas Billiau, Dries Taghon, Veerle Duprez, Kristof Eeckloo, Simon Malfait

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lukas Billiau *Strategic Policy Cell, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent, Belgium. lukas.billiau@uzgent.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-9563-0999
Dries Taghon *VIVES University of Applied Sciences, Kortrijk, Belgium.
Veerle DuprezNursing Department, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2973-3684
Kristof EecklooStrategic Policy Cell, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8668-7672
Simon MalfaitNursing Department, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7287-6034

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHead nurses have diverse job content, including operational management, human resources management, patient care, and unit-level policy development. They act as leaders, coordinators, managers, monitors, liaisons, and negotiators, and thus require broad competencies. Measuring these competencies is challenging because of the absence of integrated instruments that measure multiple intertwined competencies.

objectiveThis study aimed to identify and map existing instruments used to measure head nurses’ competencies and analyze the specific competencies they address.

methodsA scoping review according to the five-stage framework of Arksey and O’Malley was conducted. Articles focusing on developing and psychometrically testing instruments to measure the competencies of head nurses with 24-hour first-line organizational and hierarchical responsibility for one or two units in a hospital setting were included. An electronic search was conducted via PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL. The Journal of Nursing Administration, Journal of Nursing Management, Journal of Healthcare Management, International Journal of Healthcare Management, Nursing Management, Nursing Administration Quarterly, and Nursing Outlook were screened manually to identify additional articles.

resultsThis study included twelve articles published between 2006 and 2024. A total of 477 head nurse competencies were identified across 12 measurement instruments. Thematic analysis revealed four key competency areas, encompassing 20 related subthemes. First, strategic management competencies involve systemic thinking, research and evidence-based practices, change management, creative thinking, external liaison, and possessing an organizational view and political savviness. Second, operational management competencies focus on quality and safety management, process management, technology and information management, financial management, resource management, and staff planning. Third, clinical competencies encompass direct patient care, case management, customer service commitment, and diversity and ethical practices. Finally, human resources competencies include communication and interpersonal competencies, general staff management, professional development, and individual staff management. Nine instruments permitted self-assessment, two facilitated 360° assessment, and one enabled assessment by the head nurses’ superiors.

conclusionsThis study highlights inconsistencies in the terminology and descriptions of the head nurse position, as well as the competencies outlined in instruments, leading to ambiguity. To address this, clearer and more standardized definitions are needed, ensuring that competencies can be effectively measured in practice.

Indexed as

Head nurseHospitalsNursingProfessional competenceScoping reviewSurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40814107
PMCPMC12351982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.