ArticleBMC health services research2025
Exploring family physicians' experiences with electronic prescribing platforms in primary healthcare centers in Hail, Saudi Arabia: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe use of Electronic Prescribing (ePrescribing) platforms in prescribing, dispensing and claiming medications has become a trend worldwide. The utilization of this technology contributes to safer, more efficient, and satisfactory patient care. However, the experience and perspective of family physicians regarding this platform were not sufficiently evaluated in Saudi Arabia. Thus, this study aims to explore the perspectives, usage patterns, and perceived impacts of an ePrescribing platform, named Wasfaty, which has been adopted in primary healthcare centers by family physicians in Hail region in Saudi Arabia.
methodsA qualitative study was conducted using online semi-structured interviews which took place from March to September 2024. By using purposive sampling, we interviewed 12 out of 69 licensed family physicians working in different primary healthcare centers at Hail region. Five key themes (i.e., registration and adoption, quality of clinical documentation, patient safety, perspectives, and recommendation) and open questions were identified through a comprehensive literature search and consensus among researchers to assess the users' experiences and perspectives toward and impacts of the use of the ePrescribing platform in the primary healthcare centers. Thematic analysis used descriptive and inductive approaches.
resultsThe study revealed that the registration process of family physicians to the portal was straightforward. Although there were no orientation or regular training sessions after the registration, the usability and simplicity were positive. The physicians normally continued using the portal during the workday without automatic log-out during inactivity mode. The impacts of using the portal on the comprehensiveness, accuracy, and reliability of clinical documentation were optimistic. The portal supported the continuity of care for chronic disease conditions. It improved the dosage accuracy, reduced medication errors and eliminated drug-drug interactions when compared to traditional prescribing. Physicians preferred to be continuously updated about new information and features and suggested the incorporation of artificial intelligence into the portal.
conclusionThe overall experience of family physicians was positive and their perspectives toward this digital transformation are optimistic. Findings of this study asserted the inclusion of physicians in the early phase of eHealth application development. Results may be limited by the purposive sampling method and restricted generalizability to other healthcare settings. Further research is needed to expand the adoption of ePrescribing services in all Saudi healthcare centers and to improve the user experience with the electronic prescribing service worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.