ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
AI post-intervention operational and functional outcomes prediction in ischemic stroke patients using MRIs.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retrospective cohort analysis of early post treatment follow-up MRI biomarkers of collateral status associated with long-term outcomes in large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Multi-dimensional MRI representation and privileged learning approaches to functional outcome prediction for ischemic stroke patients.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Prognostic assessment and intelligent prediction system for breast reduction surgery using improved swarm intelligence optimization.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite the potential clinical utility for acute ischemic stroke patients, predicting short-term operational outcomes like length of stay (LOS) and long-term functional outcomes such as the 90-day Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) remain a challenge, with limited current clinical guidance on expected patient trajectories. Machine learning approaches have increasingly aimed to bridge this gap, often utilizing admission-based clinical features; yet, the integration of imaging biomarkers remains underexplored, especially regarding whole 2.5D image fusion using advanced deep learning techniques.
methodsThis study introduces a novel method leveraging autoencoders to integrate 2.5D diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) with clinical features for refined outcome prediction.
resultsResults on a comprehensive dataset of AIS patients demonstrate that our autoencoder-based method has comparable performance to traditional convolutional neural networks image fusion methods and clinical data alone (LOS > 8 days: AUC 0.817, AUPRC 0.573, F1-Score 0.552; 90-day mRS > 2: AUC 0.754, AUPRC 0.685, F1-Score 0.626).
conclusionThis novel integration of imaging and clinical data for post-intervention stroke prognosis has numerous computational and operational advantages over traditional image fusion methods. While further validation of the presented models is necessary before adoption, this approach aims to enhance personalized patient management and operational decision-making in healthcare settings. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.