ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences2025
Pharmacist intervention through protocol-based pharmacotherapy management is effective to ensure safety in invasive procedures for chronic liver disease.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prescription Support Practice for Pharmacy Students: Pre-Post Educational Intervention Study.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe risk of hemorrhagic complications in patients with chronic liver disease during invasive procedures should be considered. Patients with low platelet counts were administered platelet products prior to procedures based on a physician's judgment. However, there are no standards for allocating the bleeding risk associated with each procedure, platelet counts to avoid these risks, or methods for determining platelet counts. In this study, we evaluated whether pharmacists could reduce the use of platelet products by suggesting thrombopoietin receptor agonists using protocol-based pharmacotherapy management to assess procedural bleeding risk and platelet counts.
methodsAmong patients with chronic liver disease who were scheduled to undergo invasive procedures between August 2022 and February 2023, those who were interviewed by a pharmacist prior to the procedures were defined as the intervention group (n = 80) and the others as the non-intervention group (n = 224). The protocol was to define the procedural bleeding risk and platelet count. Pharmacists suggested prescribing a thrombopoietin receptor agonist to patients with platelet counts below the recommended counts.
resultsThe use of platelet products and thrombopoietin receptor agonists was 0% and 7.5% and 3.1% and 0% in the intervention and non-intervention groups, respectively. Among the patients who were required to receive lusutrombopag, all patients in the intervention groups did not receive platelet product but lusutrombopag alone. However, the rates of patients with the recommended platelet count were not different between the intervention and non-intervention groups.
conclusionsThe use of platelet products decreases without the increased incidences of hemorrhage if pharmacists suggest prescribing thrombopoietin receptor agonists based on their assessment of the platelet count and the bleeding risk of the procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.