ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Quantifying optimal inner limiting membrane peeling in macular hole surgery: a machine learning framework for predictive modeling and schematic visualization.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeInternal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in macular hole (MH) surgery is critical but challenging, and current practices lack standardized tools for quantifying and visualizing optimal peeling dimensions.This study aimed to develop a machine learning framework to recommend surgeon-specific ILM peeling radius during macular hole surgery, integrating predictive modeling with schematic visualization to guide operative planning.
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed data from 95 patients with idiopathic MH who underwent vitrectomy with ILM peeling. Preoperative and postoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) images were used to measure key MH parameters, including minimum diameter (MIN), base width (BASE), temporal length (T), nasal length (N), and height (H). The dataset was preprocessed by addressing missing values and applying Z-score normalization. 10 regression models were trained and evaluated using an 80 - 20 train-test split. Model performance was assessed using root mean squared error (RMSE), mean squared error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and the coefficient of determination (R²). A graphical user interface (GUI) was developed to generate ILM peeling schematic diagrams from OCT data.
resultsThe Ridge Regression model demonstrated the best performance, with an RMSE of 0.0320, MSE of 0.0010, MAE of 0.0209, and R² of 0.9427. The generated ILM peeling schematic diagrams provided clear visual representations, aiding surgical planning and education.
conclusionThe Ridge Regression model effectively predicts the optimal ILM peeling radius. The integration of schematic diagram generation enhances surgical planning and provides valuable educational resources, highlighting the potential of machine learning and visualization tools in improving MH surgery outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.