Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40813974›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Active involvement of children aged 11-12 years in the development of a healthy nutrition intervention - a qualitative evaluation from researchers' and children's perspectives.

Hannah Jilani, Imke Schilling, Ansgar Gerhardus, Urte Klink

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hannah JilaniDepartment for Health Services Research, Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research- IPP, University of Bremen, Grazer Str. 4, Bremen, D-28359, Germany. jilani@uni-bremen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5799-8383
Imke SchillingDepartment for Health Services Research, Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research- IPP, University of Bremen, Grazer Str. 4, Bremen, D-28359, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3094-2811
Ansgar GerhardusDepartment for Health Services Research, Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research- IPP, University of Bremen, Grazer Str. 4, Bremen, D-28359, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3637-7419
Urte KlinkDepartment for Health Services Research, Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research- IPP, University of Bremen, Grazer Str. 4, Bremen, D-28359, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8963-711X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe active involvement of target groups is gaining increasing recognition in health research. Children, in particular, have unique needs and perspectives that differ significantly from those of adult researchers, making their participation essential for improving the relevance and quality of research. Moreover, actively involving children fosters their empowerment. To advance this field, the generation of new knowledge and the refinement of methodologies are crucial. While previous studies have often engaged children with specific health conditions there remains a lack of research evaluating the involvement of healthy children, particularly in terms of process. Therefore, this study aims at answering the two following research questions: (1) What are the barriers and facilitators from the researchers' perspective when involving healthy children in research? and (2) How do children perceive their active involvement in developing a healthy nutrition intervention in Germany?

methodsFrom September 2023 to January 2024, an intervention to promote healthy nutrition was collaboratively developed with 15 healthy children aged 11 to 12 years and two researchers as part of a school activity group. The process began with joint discussions to clarify goals and roles. Intervention components were developed collaboratively with the children. Researchers documented the process through personal minutes and post scripts, which were analysed to identify barriers and facilitators across three phases: 'Initiating the process', 'Building relationships and defining aims', and 'Collaboration process'. Additionally, a child-friendly, semi-structured focus group discussion was conducted to evaluate the process, with the data analysed narratively.

resultsThe researchers' protocols and postscripts identified both barriers and facilitators across all phases. Overall, the process demanded considerable openness and flexibility from both children and researchers. Establishing shared goals and clarifying roles was time-consuming, and balancing differing expectations without causing disappointment to any of the group proved challenging. Nevertheless, the focus group showed that children enjoyed the project, appreciated the relaxed after-school setting, and valued the interactive approach. They reported learning a lot but expressed disappointment over the limited hands-on activities, such as food preparation, which they had anticipated.

conclusionsThe evaluation of children's active involvement highlighted the importance of clear expectation management for successful collaboration. This requires time, openness, and flexibility from all participants. The findings provide practical insights for researchers, supporting the effective involvement of children while reducing potential barriers in future projects.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyHealth PromotionResearch PersonnelChildFemaleFocus GroupsGermanyHumansMaleQualitative ResearchActive involvementAdolescentsChildrenEvaluationHealth researchNutrition

Identifiers

PMID40813974
PMCPMC12351763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.