ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
The experiences of family planning health professionals providing care to incarcerated patients: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough Canada completely decriminalized abortion in 1988, barriers persist, and people experiencing incarceration may face additional challenges. Family planning health professionals (FPHP) in the community may provide care to incarcerated people. This study is the first to examine their experiences and needs.
methodsWe used a community-based approach to this qualitative study and conducted interviews and focus groups with FPHP across Canada from multiple disciplines. Experts on the research team with lived experience of incarceration enhanced relevance of research questions and approaches.
resultsWe spoke with thirty participants from eight provinces, including nurses, nurse practitioners, family medicine and obstetrics-gynecology physicians, and social workers. Analysis generated three themes: Managing Multiple Systems; The Prison in the Clinic; and Future Recommendations, and six subthemes, A Firewall of Secrecy, Logistical Hoop-Jumping, Surveillance by Correctional Officers, Health Professional Strategies, A Policy for Legitimacy and We Need This in Our Training. FPHP described commitment to providing incarcerated patients equivalent care to that provided to people in community, but faced challenges with communication, preserving patient dignity, privacy, confidentiality, and safety.
conclusionFindings indicate FPHP feel ethics and safety in jeopardy when caring for incarcerated patients. FPHP express needs for improved education about roles, and for supportive professional position statements or clinical workplace policies to buttress efforts at patient advocacy. No FPHP organization in Canada has a position on care of incarcerated pregnant people. Professional position statements and workplace policies could support confident care. FPHP training should include information about incarcerated peoples' needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.