Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40813901›Full record

ReviewMolecular psychiatry2025

On the psychometric properties and genomic etiology of the general factor of psychopathology.

Erik Pettersson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Erik PetterssonDept of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Box 281, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden. erik.pettersson@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0149-9002

Funding

Vetenskapsrådet (Swedish Research Council) 2023-01999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a high degree of comorbidity in psychiatry. This implies that there might be a set of underlying common factors that influence multiple conditions. A decade ago, researchers suggested that one way to estimate these is by applying hierarchical factor models, which partition that which is shared among all psychiatric conditions (commonly labeled general psychopathology) from that which is shared by subsets of conditions (commonly labeled specific factors). Whereas the specific factors were relatively uncontroversial, the general factor has been the subject of debate. On the one hand, the general factor appears to predict clinically relevant outcomes; on the other hand, critics have questioned its psychometric foundations and genomic etiolology. In this review, I present evidence that the general factor appears to have sound psychometric properties, and that it is at least possible that it could have a genomic etiology. With the caveat that it is very difficult to identify the data generating processes underlying multivariate data, I end by offering a cautious amendment to the suggestion that the general factor might measure impulsive reactions to emotions.

Indexed as

GenomicsMental DisordersPsychometricsPsychopathologyHumans

Identifiers

PMID40813901
PMCPMC12532720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.