ReviewMolecular psychiatry2025
On the psychometric properties and genomic etiology of the general factor of psychopathology.
Review in Molecular psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Why psychopathology research should avoid studying one mental disorder at a time: An intergenerational and developmental evidence base for understanding "p".Journal of psychopathology and clinical science · 2026Review
- Comparison of Commonly Applied Outcome Inventories as Measures of General Internalizing Pathology in Psychological Therapies.Clinical psychology & psychotherapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
There is a high degree of comorbidity in psychiatry. This implies that there might be a set of underlying common factors that influence multiple conditions. A decade ago, researchers suggested that one way to estimate these is by applying hierarchical factor models, which partition that which is shared among all psychiatric conditions (commonly labeled general psychopathology) from that which is shared by subsets of conditions (commonly labeled specific factors). Whereas the specific factors were relatively uncontroversial, the general factor has been the subject of debate. On the one hand, the general factor appears to predict clinically relevant outcomes; on the other hand, critics have questioned its psychometric foundations and genomic etiolology. In this review, I present evidence that the general factor appears to have sound psychometric properties, and that it is at least possible that it could have a genomic etiology. With the caveat that it is very difficult to identify the data generating processes underlying multivariate data, I end by offering a cautious amendment to the suggestion that the general factor might measure impulsive reactions to emotions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.