ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting cortical bone resorption in the mouse tibia under disuse conditions caused by transient muscle paralysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Load removal from the load-bearing bone, such as during extended space travel or prolonged bed rest, negatively affects bone health and leads to significant bone loss. However, the underlying principle that relates the bone loss to the lack of physiological loading is poorly understood. This work develops a mathematical model that predicts cortical bone loss at three sections along the length of a mouse tibia: distal, mid-section, and proximal. Dissipation energy density induced by loading, based on interstitial fluid flow, has been adopted as the mechanotransduction-triggering stimulus. The developed model uses the loss of stimulus due to the disuse of bone as an input and predicts the quantity of bone loss with spatial accuracy. It is hypothesized that the bone loss would occur at the site of maximum stimulus loss due to disuse. To test the hypothesis, stimulus loss was calculated, i.e., loss of dissipation energy density due to bone disuse, through poroelastic analysis using the finite element method. A novel mathematical model has been developed, successfully relating this loss of stimulus to the in vivo bone loss data in the literature. As per the model, the site-specific mineral resorption rate is shown to be proportional to the square-root of the loss of dissipation energy density. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this model is the first of its kind to compute site-specific bone loss. The developed model can be extended to predict bone loss due to other disuse conditions, such as long space travel and prolonged bed rest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.