ArticleScientific reports2025
Automated insect detection and biomass monitoring via AI and electrical field sensor technology.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Capacitive Insect Sensing Under a Single Dual-Arc Geometry: A Laboratory Benchmark of Four CDC Architectures.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Insects, vital for ecosystem stability, are declining globally necessitating improved monitoring methods. Trap-based approaches are labor-intensive, invasive, and limited in scope. This study therefore presents a novel, automated, non-invasive insect monitoring system that detects atmospheric electrical field modulations caused by flying insects. In-field sensors monitor insect activity and biomass without physical trapping, using differential electric field measurements and convolutional neural networks for detection and wing-beat frequency analysis. Furthermore, a biomass algorithm that estimates taxon-specific weights is introduced. To validate this method, paired sensor and Townes Malaise trap deployments were conducted at two sites in a Danish nature reserve. Results showed moderate to strong correlations between sensors and traps, particularly at one site (Spearman's [Formula: see text] for counts; 0.644 for biomass), supporting the method's viability. A discrepancy in biomass estimates between methods, greater than that of counts, suggests the need for further refinement of the sensor's biomass estimation. For inter-method consistency, sensor-sensor correlations ([Formula: see text] for counts; 0.867 for biomass) exceeded Malaise-Malaise correlations ([Formula: see text] for counts; 0.641 for biomass), though not significantly so ([Formula: see text] for counts; [Formula: see text] for biomass). Overall, the study concludes that while further work is needed, this innovative approach shows promise for future insect monitoring and ecological research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.