Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40813792›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Year-round daily wildfire prediction and key factor analysis using machine learning: a case study of Gangwon State, South Korea.

Chanjung Lee, Eun Hyoung Choi, Youngju Han, Yohan Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chanjung LeeDepartment of Agriculture, Forestry and Bioresources, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
Eun Hyoung ChoiDepartment of Agriculture, Forestry and Bioresources, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
Youngju HanDepartment of Agriculture, Forestry and Bioresources, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
Yohan LeeDepartment of Agriculture, Forestry and Bioresources, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea. johnlee@snu.ac.kr.

Funding

Korea Forest Service (Korea Forestry Promotion Institute) RS-2024-00402509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Under climate change and human's dominant influence, wildfires have been increasing in frequency and scale, highlighting the demand of effective wildfire prediction and response. While prior research often maps high-risk areas, a few studies predict wildfire occurrences at specific dates and locations. This study aims to develop a year-round daily wildfire prediction model using machine learning, targeting Gangwon State in the Republic of Korea, and examine major influencing factors. We integrate meteorological elements (e.g., temperature, humidity, precipitation), forest-related variables (e.g., coniferous forest ratio, forest growing stock volume), and socioeconomic indicators (e.g., agricultural and cemetery land ratios) to identify salient predictors. We compare multiple algorithms, including Logistic Regression, XGBoost, and Random Forest, and use SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) to enhance interpretability. The Extra Tree model achieves the highest AUC (0.839), and Random Forest demonstrates the best recall (0.828). SHAP results confirm that meteorological factors-especially relative humidity, precipitation, and temperature-are crucial, with forest- and socioeconomic variables also showing consistent effects. Applying a machine learning-based approach to daily wildfire prediction, integrating climate, environmental, and anthropogenic factors nationwide, and refining the temporal and spatial resolution of input data helps to advance wildfire prevention and response strategies in practice.

Indexed as

Daily wildfire predictionGangwon StateMachine learningSHAPSMOTEWildfire

Identifiers

PMID40813792
PMCPMC12354747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.