Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40813789›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Carrion from large carnivores and food from humans subsidize mesocarnivores year round.

Mauriel Rodriguez Curras, Mark C Romanski, Jonathan N Pauli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mauriel Rodriguez CurrasDepartment of Forest & Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. mauriel@berkeley.edu.
Mark C RomanskiIsle Royale National Park, US National Park Service, Houghton, MI, USA.
Jonathan N PauliDepartment of Forest & Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

Funding

Office of Naval Research N00014-22-1-2625US National Parks Service P20AC00057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The return of large carnivores is predicted to suppress meso-carnivores, though it has only been observed in a minority of contemporary studies. Isle Royale is a remote island wilderness in Lake Superior, USA, managed for outdoor recreation. Following their natural extirpation, the National Parks Service translocated gray wolves (Canis lupus) in 2018-2019 and we expected the return of suppression and trophic facilitation of meso-carnivores. Nevertheless, we hypothesized that human resource subsidies led to a breakdown in meso-predator release. From Fall 2021-Winter 2024, we captured 16 individual red foxes (Vulpes vulpes), collected whiskers, and subsampled them to recreate the yearly diet of the population using stable isotope analysis. Notably, meso-carnivores were not demographically suppressed. Coinciding with the dates when Isle Royale National Park opened, fox diets were generalized, dissimilar between individuals, and primarily composed of human foods (0.28 ± 0.02) during summer. In winter, fox diets were specialized and exhibited high similarity, being composed primarily of carrion subsidized by wolves (0.62 ± 0.04). We propose that the complementarity of human resource subsidies to communities and ecosystems, broadly, may help explain the limited reach of the anticipated interactions following the return of large carnivores, such as meso-predator release.

Indexed as

CarnivoraFoxesWolvesAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesDietFood ChainHumansPredatory BehaviorSeasonsCarnivoraHuman-wildlife conflictInterspecific conflictIntraguild predationMeso-predator releaseNon-consumptive impacts

Identifiers

PMID40813789
PMCPMC12354756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.