Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40813788›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Improving CNN predictive accuracy in COVID-19 health analytics.

Tae-Hoon Kim, Asadi Srinivasulu, Ravikumar Chinthaginjala, Dhakshayani J, Xin Zhao, Safia Obaidur Rab, Sivarama Prasad Tera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tae-Hoon KimSchool of Information and Electronic Engineering, Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, No. 318, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China. 323020@zust.edu.cn.
Asadi SrinivasuluIndian Institute of Information Technology, Allahabad, 210012, India. rwi2023002@iiita.ac.in.
Ravikumar ChinthaginjalaSchool of Electronics Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, 632014, Tamil Nadu, India.
Dhakshayani JIndian Institute of Information Technology Kottayam, Kottayam, India.
Xin ZhaoSchool of Statistics and Applied Mathematics, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu, P R China.
Safia Obaidur RabDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Science, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Sivarama Prasad TeraDepartment of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati, 781039, Assam, India.

Funding

The research was partially funded by the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation Youth Fund Project (Grant No. LQ23F010004), the National Natural Science Youth Science Foundation Project (Grant No. 62201508) LQ23F010004 ; 62201508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the critical necessity for robust and accurate predictive frameworks to bolster global healthcare infrastructures. This study presents a comprehensive examination of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) applied to the prediction of COVID-19-related health outcomes, with an emphasis on core challenges, methodological constraints, and potential remediation strategies. Our investigation targets two principal aims: the identification of COVID-19 infections through chest radiographic imaging, specifically X-rays, and the prognostication of disease severity by integrating clinical parameters and electronic health records. Utilizing a multidimensional dataset encompassing demographic, clinical, and radiological information, we evaluated the efficacy of CNN architectures in forecasting patient prognoses. The CNN model attained an accuracy of 97.2%, reflecting its capability while simultaneously revealing significant challenges, including limited and imbalanced data, as well as difficulties in model interpretability. Principal limitations identified comprise overfitting, data heterogeneity, and the imperative for model adaptability amid evolving SARS-CoV-2 variants. To mitigate these issues, we propose strategies such as data augmentation, transfer learning, ensemble modeling, and enhancements in explainability, which collectively demonstrated improvements in predictive performance and theoretical robustness. This work highlights the imperative for continuous model refinement and the integration of domain-specific expertise to elevate the reliability and applicability of CNN-based prognostic tools for COVID-19 healthcare analytics. Our empirical results indicate that the CNN achieved a precision of 96.8%, an F1-score of 97.2%, and an AUC-ROC of 0.987, underscoring its effectiveness in detecting and classifying COVID-19 cases. These insights provide valuable directions for researchers and clinicians, fostering data-driven approaches in the management and prediction of COVID-19 health outcomes.

Indexed as

COVID-19Neural Networks, ComputerElectronic Health RecordsHumansPandemicsPrognosisSARS-CoV-2Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs)COVID-19Deep Learning (DL)Electronic health records (EHRs)Hyperparameter OptimizationMachine Learning (ML)Model Evaluation

Identifiers

PMID40813788
PMCPMC12354835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.