ArticleScientific reports2025
Improving CNN predictive accuracy in COVID-19 health analytics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable machine learning identifies immune-inflammatory and immunothrombotic biomarkers for myocardial injury and mortality risk stratification in severe pneumonia with diverse infectious etiologies.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Deep learning assisted LDPC decoding for 5G IoT networks in fading environments.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Healthcare Expenditure and COVID-19 in Europe: Correlation, Entropy, and Functional Data Analysis-Based Prediction of Hospitalizations and ICU Admissions.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Intelligence Architectures and Machine Learning Applications in Contemporary Spine Care.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the critical necessity for robust and accurate predictive frameworks to bolster global healthcare infrastructures. This study presents a comprehensive examination of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) applied to the prediction of COVID-19-related health outcomes, with an emphasis on core challenges, methodological constraints, and potential remediation strategies. Our investigation targets two principal aims: the identification of COVID-19 infections through chest radiographic imaging, specifically X-rays, and the prognostication of disease severity by integrating clinical parameters and electronic health records. Utilizing a multidimensional dataset encompassing demographic, clinical, and radiological information, we evaluated the efficacy of CNN architectures in forecasting patient prognoses. The CNN model attained an accuracy of 97.2%, reflecting its capability while simultaneously revealing significant challenges, including limited and imbalanced data, as well as difficulties in model interpretability. Principal limitations identified comprise overfitting, data heterogeneity, and the imperative for model adaptability amid evolving SARS-CoV-2 variants. To mitigate these issues, we propose strategies such as data augmentation, transfer learning, ensemble modeling, and enhancements in explainability, which collectively demonstrated improvements in predictive performance and theoretical robustness. This work highlights the imperative for continuous model refinement and the integration of domain-specific expertise to elevate the reliability and applicability of CNN-based prognostic tools for COVID-19 healthcare analytics. Our empirical results indicate that the CNN achieved a precision of 96.8%, an F1-score of 97.2%, and an AUC-ROC of 0.987, underscoring its effectiveness in detecting and classifying COVID-19 cases. These insights provide valuable directions for researchers and clinicians, fostering data-driven approaches in the management and prediction of COVID-19 health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.