ArticleScientific reports2025
An effective brain stroke diagnosis strategy based on feature extraction and hybrid classifier.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards trustworthy brain stroke diagnosis using a lightweight explainable deep learning framework for CT imaging.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Integration of imaging and clinical biomarkers for cerebral infarction diagnosis via NeuroFusionNet.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stroke is a leading cause of death and long-term disability worldwide, and early detection remains a significant clinical challenge. This study proposes an Effective Brain Stroke Diagnosis Strategy (EBDS). The hybrid deep learning framework integrates Vision Transformer (ViT) and VGG16 to enable accurate and interpretable stroke detection from CT images. The model was trained and evaluated using a publicly available dataset from Kaggle, achieving impressive results: a test accuracy of 99.6%, a precision of 1.00 for normal cases and 0.98 for stroke cases, a recall of 0.99 for normal cases and 1.00 for stroke cases, and an overall F1-score of 0.99. These results demonstrate the robustness and reliability of the EBDS model, which outperforms several recent state-of-the-art methods. To enhance clinical trust, the model incorporates explainability techniques, such as Grad-CAM and LIME, which provide visual insights into its decision-making process. The EBDS framework is designed for real-time application in emergency settings, offering both high diagnostic performance and interpretability. This work addresses a critical research gap in early brain stroke diagnosis and contributes a scalable, explainable, and clinically relevant solution for medical imaging diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.