ArticleNature communications2025
Transparent artificial intelligence-enabled interpretable and interactive sleep apnea assessment across flexible monitoring scenarios.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human-Centered AI in Sleep Health Management: Scoping Review of Stakeholder Perspectives and Co-Design Practices.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Cardiovascular Disease, Sleep-Disordered Breathing, and Artificial Intelligence: From Neutral Trials to Precision Sleep Cardiology.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Exploring the Role of Nocturnal Hypoxemia and Sleep Fragmentation in Memory Decline: Insights From Explainable Machine Learning Models.The clinical respiratory journal · 2026Article
- Advancements, challenges, and prospects of explainable AI in sleep disordered breathing.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early detection of widespread undiagnosed sleep apnea is crucial for preventing its severe health complications. However, large-scale diagnosis faces inaccessible monitoring and trust barriers in automated analysis, particularly due to the absence of transparent artificial intelligence frameworks capable of monitoring adaptation. Here, we develop Apnea Interact Xplainer, a transparent system enabling sleep apnea diagnosis through flexible channel analysis across clinical and home settings. Analyzing 15,807 polysomnography recordings from seven independent multi-ethnic cohorts, our system achieves accuracies of 0.738-0.810 for four-level severity classification, with 99.8% accuracy within one severity grade and R-squared of 0.92-0.96 for apnea-hypopnea index prediction on external test cohorts. The system provides multi-level expert-logic interpretable visualization of respiratory patterns enabling transparent collaborative decision-making. Notably, it achieves a sensitivity of 0.970 for early sleep apnea detection using only oximetry signals, while providing nightly risk assessment and intelligent monitoring reports. This study establishes a paradigm shift in advancing early and cost-effective sleep apnea diagnosis through transparent artificial intelligence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.