ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2026
[Teaching public health in human medicine studies in Germany].
Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Science and practice in public health services: experiences from Saxony-Anhalt and perspectives for sustainable public health services].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is an ageing medical workforce in the public health service. At the same time, challenges in recruiting young professionals persist despite the Public Health Pact. Against this backdrop, teaching in the field of public health during medical school is considered a crucial factor in arousing students' interest and attracting them to a career in the public health service. According to the Medical Licensing Regulations, there are four teaching formats related to the public health service: (i) Querschnittsbereich 3 (health economics, the health system, and public health), (ii) Klinisches Wahlfach (clinical elective), (iii) Famulatur (clinical internship), and (iv) Praktisches Jahr (practical year) in the public health service.This evaluation examines the offerings of these courses offered at medical faculties in Germany. The teaching load is low, particularly in Querschnittsbereich 3, which is a compulsory module for public health, and only a small proportion of this is allocated to teaching in public health. Only five universities offer a Klinisches Wahlfach related to public health, and only 13 faculties offer the Praktisches Jahr in the public health service.To attract young physicians to a career in the public health service, the existing gaps in teaching must be closed. Collaborations between the universities and with the local public health authorities appear to be a useful approach, particularly to address the challenges related to qualified teaching staff.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40813727What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.