Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40813727›Full record

ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2026

[Teaching public health in human medicine studies in Germany].

Julius Wiemschulte

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Julius WiemschulteFachbereich 11 Medizin, Justus-Liebig-Universität, Seltersberg Klinikstraße 29, 35392, Gießen, Deutschland. Julius.Wiemschulte@dekanat.med.uni-giessen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an ageing medical workforce in the public health service. At the same time, challenges in recruiting young professionals persist despite the Public Health Pact. Against this backdrop, teaching in the field of public health during medical school is considered a crucial factor in arousing students' interest and attracting them to a career in the public health service. According to the Medical Licensing Regulations, there are four teaching formats related to the public health service: (i) Querschnittsbereich 3 (health economics, the health system, and public health), (ii) Klinisches Wahlfach (clinical elective), (iii) Famulatur (clinical internship), and (iv) Praktisches Jahr (practical year) in the public health service.This evaluation examines the offerings of these courses offered at medical faculties in Germany. The teaching load is low, particularly in Querschnittsbereich 3, which is a compulsory module for public health, and only a small proportion of this is allocated to teaching in public health. Only five universities offer a Klinisches Wahlfach related to public health, and only 13 faculties offer the Praktisches Jahr in the public health service.To attract young physicians to a career in the public health service, the existing gaps in teaching must be closed. Collaborations between the universities and with the local public health authorities appear to be a useful approach, particularly to address the challenges related to qualified teaching staff.

Indexed as

CurriculumEducation, MedicalPublic HealthTeachingCareer ChoiceGermanyHumansClinical electiveCross-sectional module 3: health economics, the health system, and public healthMedical trainingPractical yearStaff recruitment

Identifiers

PMID40813727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.