Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40813715›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2025

Metagenomics and untargeted metabolomics reveal antibiotic resistance dynamics in an anaerobic digestion-composting system treating organic fraction of municipal solid waste.

Elisabetta Fanfoni, Paolo Bellassi, Alessandra Fontana, Erika Sinisgalli, Gabriele Rocchetti, Sergio Piccinini, Lorenzo Morelli, Fabrizio Cappa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elisabetta Fanfoni *Department for Sustainable Food Process (DiSTAS), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Cremona, Italy.
Paolo Bellassi *Department for Sustainable Food Process (DiSTAS), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Cremona, Italy.
Alessandra FontanaDepartment for Sustainable Food Process (DiSTAS), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Cremona, Italy. alessandra.fontana@unicatt.it.
Erika SinisgalliCentro Ricerche Produzioni Animali, CRPA Soc. Cons. p. A, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Gabriele RocchettiDepartment of Animal Science, Food and Nutrition (DiANA), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Cremona, Italy.
Sergio PiccininiCentro Ricerche Produzioni Animali, CRPA Soc. Cons. p. A, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Lorenzo MorelliDepartment for Sustainable Food Process (DiSTAS), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Cremona, Italy.
Fabrizio CappaDepartment for Sustainable Food Process (DiSTAS), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Cremona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe growing population and associated increase in municipal solid waste (MSW) have promoted the use of sustainable waste management strategies. Given its high organic content, MSW can be treated through anaerobic digestion (AD) and aerobic composting (AC) to recover value-added products such as bioenergy and soil amendments. However, MSW is also recognized as a relevant source of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), raising concerns about environmental and public health impacts. This study aimed to elucidate the dynamics of ARGs and antibiotic compounds during the treatment of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) through an integrated AD–AC system. By combining metagenomics and untargeted metabolomics, a comprehensive characterization of shifts in the microbial community, ARGs, and antibiotic compounds throughout the treatment stages was achieved. Shotgun sequencing enabled an in-depth resistome analysis based on metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs), while untargeted metabolomics revealed the occurrence and transformation of antibiotic compounds across the system.

resultsThe integrated process resulted in a significant differentiation of microbial communities, resistome, and antibiotic compounds profiles, at different stages of the waste treatment plant. AD samples were mostly dominated by aminoglycoside and lincosamide ARGs, whereas AC samples by macrolide and rifamycin ARGs. Despite differences in drug class dominance, the composting process significantly increased both the ARGs diversity (i.e., digestate: H = 2.6 ± 0.1; mature compost: H = 3.7 ± 0.1) and abundance (i.e., mature compost vs. digestate: log2(FC) = 3.7). Untargeted metabolomics revealed distinct distributions of antibiotics among the six matrices (i.e., pulp, digestate, solid fraction, liquid fraction, fresh compost, and mature compost) suggesting limited degradation or transformation of some classes during treatment. Digestate was enriched in phenazines and trimethoprim derivatives, whereas mature compost mainly included phenicols and sulfonamides.

conclusionsThis study provides valuable insights into the fate of antibiotic resistance genes and the persistence of antibiotic compounds in an integrated AD and AC system treating OFMSW. Moreover, it was shown how the integration of -omics techniques as metagenomics and metabolomics can be systematically utilized to detect emerging ARGs and antibiotic compounds dynamics and monitor their ongoing evolution in biological waste treatment plants.

Indexed as

Aerobic compostingAnaerobic fermentationAntibiotic compoundAntibiotic resistance geneCompostDigestateResistomeShotgun sequencingWaste treatment

Identifiers

PMID40813715
PMCPMC12355879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.