ArticleJournal of animal science and biotechnology2025
A deep learning strategy for accurate identification of purebred and hybrid pigs across SNP chips.
Article in Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Machine Learning-Based Accurate Full-Sib Family Assignment in Sturgeon Using Whole-Genome Sequencing Data.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBreed identification plays an important role in conserving indigenous breeds, managing genetic resources, and developing effective breeding strategies. However, researches on breed identification in livestock mainly focused on purebreds, and they yielded lower predict accuracy in hybrid. In this study, we presented a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) model with multi-output regression framework specifically designed for genomic breed composition prediction of purebred and hybrid in pigs.
resultsWe utilized a total of 8,199 pigs from breeding farms in eight provinces in China, comprising Yorkshire, Landrace, Duroc and hybrids of Yorkshire × Landrace. All the animals were genotyped with 1K, 50K and 100K SNP chips. Comparing with random forest (RF), support vector regression (SVR) and Admixture, our results from five replicates of fivefold cross validation demonstrated that MLP achieved a breed identification accuracy of 100% for both hybrid and purebreds in 50K and 100K SNP chips, SVR performed comparable with MLP, they both outperformed RF and Admixture. In the independent testing, MLP yielded accuracy of 100% for all three pure breeds and hybrid across all SNP chips and panel, while SVR yielded 0.026%-0.121% lower accuracy than MLP. Compared with classification-based framework, the new strategy of multi-output regression framework in this study was helpful to improve the predict accuracy. MLP, RF and SVR, achieved consistent improvements across all six SNP chips/panel, especially in hybrid identification. Our results showed the determination threshold for purebred had different effects, SVR, RF and Admixture were very sensitive to threshold values, their optimal threshold fluctuated in different scenarios, while MLP kept optimal threshold 0.75 in all cases. The threshold of 0.65-0.75 is ideal for accurate breed identification. Among different density of SNP chips, the 1K SNP chip was most cost-effective as yielding 100% accuracy with enlarging training set. Hybrid individuals in the training set were useful for both purebred and hybrid identification.
conclusionsOur new MLP strategy demonstrated its high accuracy and robust applicability across low-, medium-, and high-density SNP chips. Multi-output regression framework could universally enhance prediction accuracy for ML methods. Our new strategy is also helpful for breed identification in other livestock.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.