ArticleBMC public health2025
Physical activity promotion in the early childcare setting: a content analysis of the federal-state-wide educational framework plans in Germany.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhysical activity plays an important role over the life course for non-communicable disease prevention. At an early age, it can support physical, cognitive, and emotional development as well as the establishment of an active lifestyle throughout life. Early childcare centers provide a valuable opportunity in promoting physical activity. Yet, it is unclear, whether and to what extent policy documents such as educational framework plans incorporate physical activity promotion activities and structures in the early childcare setting. We aim to analyze the integration of physical activity in educational framework plans in Germany.
methodsTen criteria were identified based on a policy document on prevention indicators and an analytical framework for effective physical activity policy measures: (1) Physical activity as a topic in the educational framework plan, (2) availability of a pedagogical concept for physical activity, (3) objectives, (4) target groups, (5) timeframe, (6) budget, (7) implementation plan, (8) stakeholder involvement across political sectors, (9) legal status, and (10) policy evaluation. Information on the criteria was obtained from the educational framework plans, further policy documents, and a standardized self-administered questionnaire.
resultsAll educational framework plans addressed physical activity in a subchapter, while none provided a pedagogical concept on its implementation. The objectives focused on competence goals and related policy measures for physical activity promotion. Most of the educational framework plans targeted children up to 6 years and considered different subgroups. While a timeframe and budget were not mentioned, concrete assistance for policy implementation was provided. On average, three sectors were involved in the educational framework plans' development. The implementation was binding for 12 out of 16 educational framework plans. Half of the educational framework plans were evaluated either internally or externally.
conclusionsEducational framework plans describe physical activity promotion for the early childcare setting at a federal state level through their focus on children's competence development. However, minimum criteria for the implementation and evaluation of PA promotion measures are lacking in educational framework plans. Further research is needed to explore the role of educational framework plans in health promotion, considering the heterogeneity across federal states.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.