Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40813605›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Effect of tea manufacturing processes and cultivars on tea infusion color.

Chung-Tse Chen, Chin-Ying Yang, Jason T C Tzen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chung-Tse ChenGraduate Institute of Biotechnology, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, 40227, Taiwan.
Chin-Ying YangDepartment of Agronomy, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, 40227, Taiwan. emiyang@dragon.nchu.edu.tw.
Jason T C TzenGraduate Institute of Biotechnology, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, 40227, Taiwan.

Funding

Ministry of Education The Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout ProjectNational Science and Technology Council NSTC 113-2634-F-005 -002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tea, one of the most popular beverages worldwide, is produced from the tender leaves of Camellia sinensis through complex chemical processes. Tea quality is largely determined by its aroma and color, which are influenced by the tea's manufacturing process and cultivar. However, limited research has explored the combined effects of processing methods and tea cultivars on tea infusion color. This study compared the effects of semi-fermented oolong tea and fully fermented black tea processing on infusion color using Taiwan Tea Experiment Station (TTES) No. 18 and Chin-shin cultivars. The results revealed that oolong tea processing minimized polyphenol oxidase activity and preserved catechins, resulting in a lighter infusion color. In contrast, black tea processing enhanced theaflavin production, deepening the yellow-orange color of the tea infusion. TTES No. 18, with higher catechin content, exhibited a darker tea color compared to Chin-shin. This study highlights the significant influence of processing methods and tea cultivar on infusion color. Oolong tea processing maintains catechin levels and a lighter color, while black tea processing intensifies theaflavin content and deepens the color. These findings provide insights into optimizing tea production to enhance the visual quality of tea infusions.

Indexed as

Camellia sinensisFood HandlingTeaBiflavonoidsCatechinCatechol OxidaseColorFermentationPlant LeavesBiflavonoidsCatechinCatechol OxidaseTeatheaflavinCamellia sinensisCatechinsPolyphenol oxidaseTea processingTheaflavins

Identifiers

PMID40813605
PMCPMC12354773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.