ArticleScientific reports2025
In situ electric field dosimetry analysis for powerline frequency peripheral nerve magnetic stimulation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Humans are exposed to environmental 60 Hz magnetic fields (MFs), inducing in our body electric fields (EFs) and currents, potentially stimulating the peripheral nervous system (PNS). Uncertainties exist regarding the 60 Hz MF PNS stimulation threshold. The spatially extended nonlinear node model (SENN) is used to help define international MF exposure guidelines and standards protecting workers and the general public. However, other models exist, particularly the McIntyre-Richardson-Grill (MRG) model, the new gold standard for electrostimulation. This study aims (1) to model a new extremely low frequency MF exposure system for the human leg and (2) to investigate the in situ EFs generated by the system at 60 Hz at the skin level and in the nerves of the leg using a realistic human body model with both the SENN and the MRG models. A Helmholtz like-coil system was designed to generate in situ EFs sufficient for nerve stimulation, modeled using Biot-Savart and Faraday laws. Sim4Life simulations assessed the induced EFs at skin and nerve levels using a detailed human body model and two nerve excitation frameworks: the SENN and MRG models. High EF intensities were observed in four sensory and sensory-motor nerves, with MRG-derived thresholds lower than SENN-derived thresholds. Results also highlight the significance of nerve orientation in EF induction. This study emphasizes the critical role of comprehensive modeling for the design and validation of MF exposure systems and underscores the need for experimental data to refine models, standards, and guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.