Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40813596›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Multi-sensor remote sensing captures geometry and slow-to-fast sliding transition of the 2017 Mud Creek landslide.

Alexander L Handwerger, Pascal Lacroix, Andrew F Bell, Adam M Booth, Mong-Han Huang, Simon M Mudd, Roland Bürgmann, Eric J Fielding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alexander L HandwergerJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, 91109, USA. alexander.handwerger@jpl.nasa.gov.
Pascal LacroixISTERRE, University Grenoble Alpes, University Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, IRD, UGE, Grenoble, France.
Andrew F BellSchool of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XP, UK.
Adam M BoothDepartment of Geology, Portland State University, Portland, OR, 97207, USA.
Mong-Han HuangDepartment of Geology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.
Simon M MuddSchool of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XP, UK.
Roland BürgmannDepartment of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Eric J FieldingJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, 91109, USA.

Funding

NASA 80NM0018D0004NASA 80NSSC22K0461National Science Foundation ICER-2023112
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Landslides pose a significant hazard worldwide. Despite advances in landslide monitoring, predicting their size, timing, and location remains a major challenge. We revisit the 2017 Mud Creek landslide in California using radar interferometry, pixel tracking, and elevation change measurements from satellite and airborne radar, lidar, and optical data. Our analysis shows that pixel tracking of optical imagery captured the transition from slow motion to runaway acceleration starting ~ 1 month before catastrophic failure-an acceleration undetected by satellite InSAR alone. Strain rate maps revealed a new slip surface formed within the landslide body during acceleration, likely a key weakening mechanism. Failure forecast analysis indicates the acceleration followed a hyperbolic trend, suggesting failure time could have been predicted at least 6 days in advance. We also inverted for the landslide thickness during the slow-moving phase and found variations from < 1 to 36 m. While thickness inversions provide important first-order information on landslide size, more work is needed to better understand how landslide subsurface properties and deforming volumes may evolve during the transition from slow-to-fast motion. Our findings underscore the need for integrated remote sensing techniques to improve landslide monitoring and forecasting. Future advancements in operational monitoring systems and big data analysis will be critical for tracking slope instability and improving regional-scale failure predictions.

Identifiers

PMID40813596
PMCPMC12354922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.