Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40813494›Full record

ArticlePlanta2025

Molecular evolution of chloroplast genome in Triumfetta (Grewioideae, Malvaceae).

Rushan Yan, Yujie Zeng, Chengyu Chen, Abdur Rab, Hui Li, Raza Ullah, Madiha Islam, Ying Cui, Mengyang Liu, Xiaoxuan Tian

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Two Species of Wild Long-Fruited Jute (International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Complete Chloroplast Genomes ofEcology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Characterization ofEcology and evolution · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rushan YanState Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Modernization, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 301617, China.
Yujie ZengState Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Modernization, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 301617, China.
Chengyu ChenState Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Modernization, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 301617, China.
Abdur RabDepartment of Zoology, Hazara Univeristy, Manshera, 21120, Pakistan.
Hui LiState Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Modernization, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 301617, China.
Raza UllahDepartment of Biology, College of Arts and Science, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, 27412, USA.
Madiha IslamDepartment of Genetics, Hazara University, Manshera, 21120, Pakistan.
Ying CuiState Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Modernization, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 301617, China.
Mengyang LiuState Key Laboratory of Component-Based Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 301617, China. liumengyang0212@tjutcm.edu.cn.
Xiaoxuan TianState Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Modernization, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 301617, China. tian_xiaoxuan@tjutcm.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4248-9943

Funding

The Ability Establishment of Sustainable Use for Valuable Chinese Medicine Resources 2060302
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionThis study provides insights into the chloroplast genome evolution of Triumfetta, identifies polymorphic loci for molecular marker development, and offers preliminary phylogenomic evidence on the evolutionary relationships within the genus. The genus Triumfetta Plum. ex L. (Grewioideae, Malvaceae) is a pantropical group comprising approximately 177 species. Despite its diversity, its chloroplast (cp) genomics remain unstudied. To investigate evolutionary dynamics and phylogenetic relationships within Triumfetta, complete cp genomes of eight species were de novo assembled and compared with two publicly available genomes. These cp genomes were 160,075 to 160,604 base pairs (bp) long and consisted of a large single-copy region (89,006-89,386 bp), a small single-copy region (20,142-20,266 bp), and a pair of inverted repeats (IRa and IRb, 25,440-25,498 bp), encoding 112 unique genes (78 protein-coding, 30 transfer RNA, and 4 ribosomal RNA). Comparative analyses showed high similarity in GC content, IR contraction/expansion, codon usage, substitution patterns, and repeat structures. An inversion was identified in the LSC region of Triumfetta tomentosa, reversing six genes: trnC, petN, psbM, trnD, trnY, and trnE, without gene loss. Six genes (psbK, rpl20, rpl23, rps16, rps7, and ycf2) showed signatures of positive selection, suggesting potential roles in adaptation. Ten polymorphic loci were identified across intergenic and coding regions, including trnR-atpA, rpl33-rps18, ccsA-ndhD, clpP, rpl22, and ycf1, representing useful markers for DNA barcoding and population genetics. Phylogenetic analysis revealed Triumfetta is monophyletic and closely related to Corchorus L. Triumfetta species formed two distinct clades, reflecting a clear biogeographic divergence: one comprising African and Asian species, and the other consisting exclusively of Australian species. This study provides the first insights into cp genome variation and phylogenetic relationships in Triumfetta, offering resources for further phylogenetic, barcoding, and conservation research.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, ChloroplastBase CompositionChloroplastsPhylogenyChloroplast genomeComparative genomicsMolecular markersPhylogenyTriumfetta

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.