ReviewEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2025
Fortification, folate and vitamin B12 balance, and the nervous system. Is folic acid excess potentially harmful?
Review in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Altered thinking on folic acid supplementation to prevent NTD pregnancy: obviating potential harm based on the physico-chemical properties of natural folate vitamers.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Article
- Reassessing Mandatory Folic Acid Fortification for Neural Tube Defect Prevention: Evidence, Uncertainty, and Policy Implications.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Importance of Vitamin Supplementation During Pregnancy: Pancytopenia in a 3-Month-Old Neonate.Reports (MDPI) · 2026Article
- Nutrients and bioactive compounds in polycystic ovary syndrome: updated insights into effects and underlying mechanisms.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Vitamins, Vascular Health and Disease.Nutrients · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The benefits of folic acid fortification are well known but less understood or acknowledged is the growing evidence of potential harms to the nervous system from excess folate, primarily because of a combination of fortification and/or high and sustained intake of folic acid supplements. We have summarised the historical, clinical, epidemiological and experimental evidence accumulated over the last 60 years in the pre and postfortification eras, which consistently and substantially suggests that excess folate, in particular in folic acid users, can have direct harms to the nervous system, especially in the presence of vitamin B12 deficiency. The harms are related both to the dose and duration of exposure to excess folic acid. Recent experimental evidence suggests that impaired cortical neurogenesis with excess folic acid is similar to that of folate or vitamin B12 deficiency and greatest when folate excess is present with vitamin B12 deficiency. Excess folate leads to a fall in vitamin B12 levels and aggravation of the block in folate metabolism resulting from vitamin B12 deficiency. The balance between folate and vitamin B12 is crucial to the functioning of one carbon metabolic pathways, the methylation cycle and ultimately to DNA and RNA structure and function, genetic and epigenetic stability. Vitamin B12 deficiency is an independent risk factor for NTDs and accounts for the increased risk of NTDs in some countries where B12 deficiency is more common than folate deficiency. A more prudent and balanced approach to fortification with folic acid, or preferably a natural reduced folate, combined with vitamin B12 would potentially improve the benefits and reduce the harms, including epigenetic and transgenerational risks, associated with current public health policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40813465What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.