Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40813450›Full record

ArticleJournal of human genetics2025

Assessment of ability of a DNA language model to predict pathogenicity of rare coding variants.

David Curtis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

David CurtisUCL Genetics Institute, University College London, London, UK. d.curtis@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4089-9183

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A recently described method to predict pathogenicity of DNA variants uses a DNA language model and can be applied to both coding and non-coding variants. For coding variants the performance of this method, termed GPN-MSA (genomic pretrained network with multiple-sequence alignment), was reported to be superior to CADD. We compare the performance of this method against 45 other predictors applied to rare coding variants in 18 gene-phenotype pairs. We find that while GPN-MSA produces stronger evidence for association than CADD it is not the best-performing method for any gene and on average other prediction methods are superior. While GPN-MSA may be useful for predicting the pathogenicity of non-coding variants, it would seem sensible for clinicians and researchers to utilise other methods when dealing with coding variants.This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource.

Indexed as

DNAGenetic VariationModels, GeneticComputational BiologyGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansPhenotypeDNA

Identifiers

PMID40813450
PMCPMC12552115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.