ArticleScientific reports2025
Development of a deep learning algorithm for radiographic detection of syndesmotic instability in ankle fractures with intraoperative validation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying syndesmotic instability in ankle fractures using conventional radiographs is still a major challenge. In this study we trained a convolutional neural network (CNN) to classify the fracture utilizing the AO-classification (AO-44 A/B/C) and to simultaneously detect syndesmosis instability in the conventional radiograph by leveraging the intraoperative stress testing as the gold standard. In this retrospective exploratory study we identified 700 patients with rotational ankle fractures at a university hospital from 2019 to 2024, from whom 1588 digital radiographs were extracted to train, validate, and test a CNN. Radiographs were classified based on the therapy-decisive gold standard of the intraoperative hook-test and the preoperatively determined AO-classification from the surgical report. To perform internal validation and quality control, the algorithm results were visualized using Guided Score Class activation maps (GSCAM).The AO44-classification sensitivity over all subclasses was 91%. Furthermore, the syndesmosis instability could be identified with a sensitivity of 0.84 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78, 0.92) and specificity 0.8 (95% CI 0.67, 0.9). Consistent visualization results were obtained from the GSCAMs. The integration of an explainable deep-learning algorithm, trained on an intraoperative gold standard showed a 0.84 sensitivity for syndesmotic stability testing. Thus, providing clinically interpretable outputs, suggesting potential for enhanced preoperative decision-making in complex ankle trauma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.