ArticleScientific reports2025
A forewarning model for the reverse supply chain of urban End-of-Life power batteries based on a mix method of BWM and RBFNN.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Driven by global sustainable development strategies, the New Energy Vehicle (NEV) industry is expanding rapidly, and the imminent surge in End-of-Life Power Batteries (ELPB) presents significant challenges to the resilience of their reverse supply chains. Optimizing Supply Chain Resilience (SCR) requires scientifically robust evaluation methods. However, existing approaches exhibit key limitations: multi-criteria decision-making methods often lack dynamic assessment capabilities and rely heavily on subjective expert judgment, while data-driven models face high data acquisition costs and limited interpretability, especially within emerging industries. To address these gaps, this paper proposes a comprehensive SCR evaluation framework for urban ELPBs supply chains, structured around three core dimensions: robustness, flexibility, and recovery capability. The Best-Worst Method (BWM) is employed to identify the most critical indicators, which then serve as inputs to a Radial Basis Function Neural Network (RBFNN). This approach reduces the burden of data collection while enhancing model transparency. Utilizing data from 60 cities in China, a multi-modal data fusion forewarning model for SCR is developed. The model, trained on ten key indicators, including total recovery cost (C3), remanufactured battery price (C5), and number of recycling sites (S1), demonstrates high predictive accuracy, even with limited historical data. The model is further applied to forecast SCR trends over a five-year horizon in Shenzhen, Chengdu, and Shenyang, revealing how SCR dynamics align with differing urban policy orientations. Based on these insights, differentiated and targeted SCR enhancement strategies are proposed for each city, integrating controllable resilience factors with local contextual characteristics. This paper offers a scalable and interpretable tool for evaluating and strengthening SCR in the context of emerging sustainable industries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.