Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40813241›Full record

ArticleGlobal health, science and practice2025

Disinfection of Neonatal Resuscitation Equipment in Resource-Limited Settings: Lessons From a Mixed-Methods Implementation Experience in Kenya.

Anne M White, Dominic Mutai, Allison Parsons, David Cheruiyot, Beena D Kamath-Rayne, Joshua K Schaffzin, Joel E Mortensen, Amy R L Rule

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health, science and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anne M WhiteDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota College of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, USA. whit3243@umn.edu.
Dominic MutaiTenwek Hospital, Bomet, Kenya.
Allison ParsonsRescue: The Behavior Change Agency, Washington, DC, USA.
David CheruiyotTenwek Hospital, Bomet, Kenya.
Beena D Kamath-RayneAmerican Academy of Pediatrics, Itasca, IL, USA.
Joshua K SchaffzinDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Joel E MortensenDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Amy R L RuleThe Global Collaborating Center for Perinatal Equity, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe majority of neonatal deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries, most often due to perinatal events, prematurity, and/or infection. Reprocessing of neonatal resuscitation equipment is vital for ensuring the availability of clean equipment and preventing transmission of infection to a newborn. Staff at Tenwek Hospital, a tertiary referral hospital in rural Kenya, identified reprocessing medical equipment as a gap in improving neonatal care. We sought to implement steam-based high-level disinfection (HLD) for reprocessing neonatal resuscitation equipment in the labor and delivery ward of Tenwek Hospital. NEEDS ASSESSMENT: Before implementation, a needs assessment was conducted to identify existing facilitators and barriers to reprocessing through semistructured interviews with key stakeholders at the hospital (N=12) and identify gaps in the hospital's existing reprocessing procedures. A chemical, chlorine-based method of disinfection was used for neonatal resuscitation equipment in the ward. We conducted baseline bacterial burden of neonatal resuscitation equipment before clinical use, after clinical use, and after reprocessing. There was not a significant decrease in bacterial burden after reprocessing. IMPLEMENTATION: After implementing a new steam-based HLD process, we conducted bacterial burden testing, which showed a reduction. However, staff preferences and implementation challenges compelled us to modify our original plan and instead implement optimized chemical HLD using chlorine. Although testing showed improved bacterial burden from baseline, in our small number of samples, bacterial burden testing after implementing the optimized chemical HLD process did not differ significantly compared to steam-based HLD.

conclusionsOptimal chemical HLD was felt to be feasible and sustainable in the local setting. Reprocessing methods should be designed for unique challenges in low-resource settings.

Indexed as

DisinfectionEquipment ContaminationEquipment ReuseResuscitationCross InfectionDeveloping CountriesHumansInfant, NewbornKenyaResource-Limited Settings

Identifiers

PMID40813241
PMCPMC12352943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.