Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40813101›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2025

Accelerating the approval of mpox vaccines based on lessons learnt from COVID-19 vaccines through the lens of regulatory science.

Shanshan Li, Xiaoyi Yu, Yifan Yao, Tianen Yao, Ming Xu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shanshan LiDepartment of Global Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9704-7101
Xiaoyi YuDepartment of Global Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Yifan YaoDepartment of Global Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Tianen YaoDepartment of Global Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Ming XuDepartment of Global Health, Peking University, Beijing, China xum2022@pku.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-4600-8644

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The expedited approval of mpox vaccines is critical to addressing this public health emergency. Building on the practice in approving COVID-19 vaccines, this analysis investigates the regulatory pathways used to accelerate vaccine approvals and their implications for mpox vaccine development. The study highlights the regulatory frameworks of the WHO Emergency Use Listing, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Emergency Use Authorisation, the European Medicines Agency Conditional Marketing Authorisation and Japan's Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency Emergency Approval. A comparative analysis of these pathways reveals differences in application conditions, data requirements, review timelines and post-approval obligations. The study also draws key lessons from the case analysis of COVID-19 vaccine approvals, providing additional insights for the approval of mpox vaccines. Our study underscores the importance of maintaining rigorous regulatory standards while expediting vaccine development and identifies fit-for-purpose strategies to enhance global preparedness for future public health crises, ensuring the availability of safe, effective and high-quality vaccines.

Indexed as

Drug ApprovalSmallpox VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansJapanUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationWorld Health OrganizationCOVID-19 VaccinesSmallpox VaccineCOVID-19Global HealthVaccines

Identifiers

PMID40813101
PMCPMC12352143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.