ReviewBMJ global health2025
Accelerating the approval of mpox vaccines based on lessons learnt from COVID-19 vaccines through the lens of regulatory science.
Review in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Role of Pharmacists in Tackling Mpox: Challenges and Future Prospects: A Narrative Review.Health science reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The expedited approval of mpox vaccines is critical to addressing this public health emergency. Building on the practice in approving COVID-19 vaccines, this analysis investigates the regulatory pathways used to accelerate vaccine approvals and their implications for mpox vaccine development. The study highlights the regulatory frameworks of the WHO Emergency Use Listing, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Emergency Use Authorisation, the European Medicines Agency Conditional Marketing Authorisation and Japan's Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency Emergency Approval. A comparative analysis of these pathways reveals differences in application conditions, data requirements, review timelines and post-approval obligations. The study also draws key lessons from the case analysis of COVID-19 vaccine approvals, providing additional insights for the approval of mpox vaccines. Our study underscores the importance of maintaining rigorous regulatory standards while expediting vaccine development and identifies fit-for-purpose strategies to enhance global preparedness for future public health crises, ensuring the availability of safe, effective and high-quality vaccines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.