SynthesisBMJ global health2025
Equity in protection: bridging global data gaps for an EBV vaccine-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk of Multiple Sclerosis Among Persons with Epstein Barr Virus-Positive Mononucleosis: A Population-Based Study.Neurology open access · 2026Article
- Beyond the Usual Suspects: Emerging Associations Between Epstein-Barr Virus Infection/Infectious Mononucleosis and Cancers.Reviews in medical virology · 2026Review
- Proteome-Wide Serological Profiling Reveals Broad Elevation of EBV Immunity in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Web of Science-Based Visualization of Mapping Global Scientific Production on Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Autoimmune Diseases: A Bibliometric Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEpstein-Barr virus (EBV) is linked to multiple malignancies and autoimmune conditions, with different disease burdens globally. Pharmaceutical companies and researchers are placing substantial investment in the development of EBV vaccines. To ensure optimal vaccine roll-out, particularly in resource-limited settings, it is essential to have data on the age at acquisition of EBV. This study aimed to systematically review and meta-analyse seroprevalence by age and country, WHO region and country income level, identify knowledge gaps, and determine an approach to bridge these gaps.
methodsMEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science were searched on 22 March 2022 for studies that measured EBV seroprevalence by age. An updated search was conducted on 22 October 2022. There were no language restrictions. Papers were assessed for quality using an adapted version of the Downs and Black checklist. Seroprevalence by age was estimated using a fixed-effect (country) or random-effects (WHO region and income) meta-analysis. This review has been registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022349900).
resultsOnly one country (USA) had enough data for a country meta-analysis. WHO regional analyses revealed the Western Pacific region to have a higher seroprevalence in younger age groups than other WHO regions. Country income level better explained seroprevalence trends per age. Middle-income countries displayed a quicker rise to balance seroprevalence than high-income countries, with a 30% absolute increase in 0- to 4-year-olds in middle-income than in high-income countries (59% [95% CI 28 to 91%, I
conclusionThis first meta-analysis producing estimates of EBV seroprevalence by age provides crucial information to guide governments when using a vaccine for EBV. However, data variability and limited consistency of methodologies and EBV seroprevalence measurements hindered comprehensive meta-analyses across all WHO regions and countries. This study provides an interim framework for the extrapolation of seroprevalence using country-specific income levels to aid vaccine roll-out decisions. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022349900.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.