ArticleBMJ open2025
The use of cost analysis in examinations of health coaching interventions: a scoping review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Use of cost analysis in examinations of health coaching interventions: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHealth coaching is the process of working with a trained coach, peer, or healthcare professional towards self-determined health and wellness goals. Health coaching is being increasingly adopted in multiple healthcare settings and has been shown to improve overall health outcomes and long-term maintenance of chronic conditions in multiple countries and healthcare settings. Research surrounding the costs of implementing health coaching and its effects on healthcare costs, particularly long-term costs, has been limited. Although analysis of healthcare costs has become an important priority in recent years, the available literature looking at the cost impacts of health coaching is small and inconclusive, finding mixed results with a variety of methodologies. This scoping review aims to identify gaps in the literature and help set a research agenda regarding the costs of health coaching implementation and its impacts. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The scoping review will be structured according to Levac et al's enhancement to Arksey and O'Malley's framework for conducting scoping reviews. PubMed, Embase, and the Health and Medicine Collection will be searched for peer-reviewed research that includes health and wellness coaching and some measurement of cost. Details about the type of study, cost analysis, methodology and results from the included articles will be extracted and summarised. Full-text publications, excluding editorials and opinion pieces, included in this scoping review will be published in 2017 or later, will be written in English, will align with the definition of health coaching as described by the National Board for Health and Wellness Coaching ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and through presentations to both health system and community-based entities currently using or considering adopting health coaching. Ethics approval is not a requirement for this review as no human research participants will be involved. All data will be obtained from publicly available literature, with no primary data generated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.