ArticleBMJ open2025
Effect of intraoperative oesophageal pressure-guided PEEP on postoperative pulmonary complications in elderly patients undergoing major laparoscopic surgery: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial in China.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06150079 (Effect of Individualized PEEP Titration on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Elderly Patients Undergoing Major Laparoscopic Surgery- A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Individualized PEEP Titration on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Elderly Patients Undergoing Major Laparoscopic Surgery- A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPostoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) induced by mechanical ventilation in general anaesthesia are related to poor clinical outcomes. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is a key component of the lung protective ventilation strategy. Individualised PEEP guided by end-expiratory oesophageal pressure (Pes) to maintain a positive end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure can avoid alveolar collapse and improve the respiratory mechanics. However, there is no research studying the relationship between the Pes-guided PEEP titration and PPCs. The aim of our study is to investigate the potential role of Pes-guided PEEP titration on the incidence of PPCs and respiratory mechanics. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A total of 232 elderly patients undergoing major laparoscopic surgery under general anaesthesia will be recruited in four tertiary teaching hospitals in China. Patients will be randomly allocated to the control group (PEEP set at 3 cm H ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has received ethics approval from the ethics committee of the Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University (China) with the approval number B2023-334R. The results of the study will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. PROTOCOL VERSION: Version 1, on 9 October 2023. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06150079.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.