Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40812803›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

The OPTION trial: outpatient induction of labour - study protocol for a prospective, non-inferiority, multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Verena Sengpiel, Heléne Sangskär, Ulla-Britt Wennerholm, Helen Elden, Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson, Sofie Graner, Tove Wallström, Susanne Hesselman, Magnus Domellöf, Maria Jonsson and 4 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Verena SengpielDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Gothenburg Sahlgrenska Academy, Goteborg, Sweden verena.sengpiel@obgyn.gu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3608-7430
Heléne SangskärDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Goteborg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8684-9723
Ulla-Britt WennerholmDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Goteborg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2475-2226
Helen EldenHealth and Care Sciences, Goteborgs Universitet, Goteborg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0000-0476
Kristina Gemzell-DanielssonDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6516-1444
Sofie GranerMaternity BB, Danderyds Sjukhus AB, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1355-9973
Tove WallströmDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Hospital Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
Susanne HesselmanDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9173-2909
Magnus DomellöfDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Pediatrics, Umeå Universitet Medicinska fakulteten, Umea, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0726-7029
Maria JonssonDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala, Sweden.
Sophia Brismar WendelDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9401-8062
Andreas HerbstInstitution for Clinical Sciences, Lunds Universitet, Lund, Sweden.
Helena Kopp-Kallner *Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Danderyd University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7184-9165
Ylva Carlsson *Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Goteborg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1414-7279

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSweden, as many other high-income countries, has adopted guidelines to offer induction of labour at 41+0 gestational weeks to decrease the risk for perinatal death. As more than 20% of the pregnant population reach this gestational age, and along with other contributing factors, induction rates have increased up to 30% in many countries. Both women and care providers have raised the question if outpatient induction could be a convenient, safe and economic alternative, reducing the burden on inpatient care in maternity hospitals. Before introducing outpatient induction into clinical routine, studies need to assure safety for the child and woman as well as efficacy of the method. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: A register-based randomised controlled multicentre non-inferiority trial to study if outpatient induction in low-risk inductions is (1) as safe for the child (perinatal composite of mortality and morbidity) and (2) as effective (proportion of vaginal deliveries) as inpatient induction at the hospital. Secondary outcomes are further health outcomes, experiences of pregnant women, partners and care providers, health economics and future pregnancy outcome. Participating women with a singleton pregnancy and unripe cervix between 37+0 and 41+6 gestational weeks planned for low-risk induction will undergo induction of labour with either a balloon catheter or oral misoprostol according to clinical practice at the study site and the woman's informed choice. Randomisation will allocate women to either outpatient (home or patient hotel) or inpatient induction (standard care). Women undergoing outpatient induction can remain at home for up to 2 days, with an assessment after 24 hours including cardiotocography. Once active labour ensues, all women will receive standard care in the hospital.The assessment of non-inferiority will involve a two-sided 95% CI and 80% power, requiring randomisation of 8891 women to ensure a probability of at least 0.80 that the upper limit of a two-sided 95.7% CI for a difference in the primary safety outcome is below the non-inferiority margin of 1.5%. 31 of the 45 delivery units in Sweden are currently recruiting. Data will be collected from the electronic case report form and Swedish healthcare registers. Questionnaire and qualitative interview-based studies will be performed to explore experiences of pregnant women, partners and care providers. Additionally, a health economic evaluation will be performed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Swedish Ethical Review Authority approved the study (3 June 2020; 2020-02675 with amendments 2021-03045, 2022-00865-02, 2023-01252-02, 2024-00560-02, 2024-2024-04597-02). The Swedish Medical Products Agency approved the study for the medication arm (25 August 2020, EudraCT number: 2020-000233-41; 5.1-2020-60240 with amendments 5.1-2022-73500, 5.1-2023-630). Due to changed regulation, in 2023, the study medication arm was transferred and approved by the European Medicines Agency (23 October 2023, EU CT Number: 2023-507164-39-00; CTIS 5.1.2-2023-099775 with amendments 5.1.2-2024-081916, 5.1.2-2025-036291). The Swedish Medical Products Agency approved the study for the medical device arm (6 April 2021, CIV-ID: CIV-20-09-034712; 5.1-2021-14812 with amendments 5.1-2022-14252, 5.1-2023-596, 5.1-2024-8886, 5.1-2024-55554). The medical device arm was transferred to Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (23 December 2024, 5.1-2025-24242 and amendment 5.1-2025-6050). The study will involve more than 80% of all delivery units in Sweden, which will allow for a smooth implementation of any new routine after the study's conclusion. Results will be published in relevant scientific journals, presented at national and international conferences, and communicated to participants and relevant institutions through the Outpatient Induction study homepage (www.optionstudien.se), the webinars of the Swedish Network for National Clinical Studies in Obstetrics and Gynecology (www.snaks.se) as well as social and public media. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT No: 2020-000233-41, after transfer to the European Medicines Agency EU CT Number: 2023-507164-39-00; CIV-ID 20-09-034712.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareLabor, InducedAdultEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleGestational AgeHumansMisoprostolMulticenter Studies as TopicOutpatientsOxytocicsPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSwedenMisoprostolOxytocicsHEALTH ECONOMICSMaternal medicineNEONATOLOGYPatient SatisfactionPregnant WomenRandomized Controlled Trial

Identifiers

PMID40812803
PMCPMC12352190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.