ArticleApplied clinical informatics2025
Optimizing Documentation Integrity of Ophthalmic Diagnostic Test Interpretation through Electronic Health Record Clinical Decision Support.
Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electronic health records (EHRs) have revolutionized clinical practice, but clinicians and institutions have not yet fully optimized their use. Inconsistent documentation of ophthalmic test results can increase potential medicolegal risks if providers bill for tests without properly documenting clinical interpretations.To address this, we developed and implemented a logic tool in Epic (Epic Systems, Verona, Wisconsin, United States) that prompts clinicians to document diagnostic test interpretations as discrete data before closing the patient chart.We implemented a "Close Encounter Warning" using logic rules to redirect clinicians to the Imaging and Procedures section of the Epic chart for documenting test interpretations. The implementation only allows clinicians to finalize each outpatient encounter's charting as closed if the logic rules confirm that no unsigned test results remain. The logic rules were revised many times to accommodate the unique workflow of the Ophthalmology department and to consider the roles of fellows, residents, and staff who also work with encounter charting. We implemented the initial logic rule on October 23, 21 and the final iteration on February8, 22. To evaluate the impact, we compared the number of closed charts containing unresulted diagnostic tests from October 2017 to December 2024.Before we implemented the logic rules, clinicians closed an average of 897.1 charts per month with unresulted diagnostic images (median: 916, interquartile range [IQR]: 170, 5.78% of all outpatient encounters). After implementation, this number dropped to 8.3 per month (median: 8, IQR: 5.75, 0.05% of all outpatient encounters), a 108% reduction (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.