ArticleAnalytical chemistry2025
Easy Visualization Tool To Ensure Proper Tracer Addition during Isotope Dilution Mass Spectrometry Elemental Analyses: Application to Total and Metallomic Speciation (Postcolumn IDMS) of Iron, Zinc, and Copper in a Commercial Infant Formula.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) is used worldwide for precise quantitative total and speciation analysis. It relies on the accurate quantification of an analyte or a species in a single experiment. The minimization of error propagation during the addition of the tracer solution ensures measurement accuracy. Its verification in the total analysis can be easily accomplished by simple calculations. Nevertheless, it is hardly applicable to transient signal chromatographic analyses. Generally speaking, scientists sometimes struggle to justify the isotopic tracer concentration selected for their chromatographic studies by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Often, the tracer concentration selected is the one that ensures a close-to-1-ratio in species-specific isotope dilution analysis, which usually leads to good results. In species-unspecific isotope dilution analysis, using postcolumn IDMS methodology, the criteria is generally one "at middle-height of the peak with maximum intensity." However, this approach is debated for the quantification of several species presenting important intensity variations. In this situation, the following question emerges: What is the perfect tracer concentration to be used, that is able to quantify the majority of the species eluted from the chromatographic column in an accurate manner? The tool presented in this article (using a milk-based sample) intends to be a fairy godmother that acts as a wise advisor for the in-field scientist that needs to deal with total or postcolumn IDMS measurements. The approach aims to study the tool's versatility (applicable to any element) and readiness (easily applicable after reading this manuscript) while acting as a facilitator (simplifying laboratory experiments).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.