ArticleWaste management (New York, N.Y.)2025
Lost on the Pacific Crest Trail: a 4,270 km survey of wilderness waste distribution and characteristics.
Article in Waste management (New York, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Characterization and intervention impacts on litter across public land types in Northern Idaho.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mismanaged waste threatens the environment and human health. To better understand waste sources and impacts along recreation trails, we surveyed the entire 4,270 km Pacific Crest Trail, conducting 251 waste surveys (1 km every 16 km). Surveys counted and classified waste within 2 m of the trail. We estimated that there were 53,000 pieces (12,000-130,000) of waste along the trail in 2023, based on a mean count of 12.5 pieces per km. Waste count had a negative log-log linear relationship with distance to the nearest road. Far in the backcountry (survey start 10 km from a road), waste was sparse (0.4 pieces per km), but close to roads (10 m from a road), waste increased to 13 pieces per km. The most common material types were soft plastic (36 %), metal (11 %), and sanitary waste (10 %). The most common morphologies were fragments (47 %), package ends (7 %), and wipes (6 %). Brands visible on waste were rare (48 pieces). We assessed the bias of this survey method, showing that it underestimated waste counts by 50 % compared to conducting the survey twice or with twice the number of surveyors. Surveying trail sections with snow cover or at night also reduced observed counts. These findings suggest that cleanup near roads, waste handling education, reduced plastic use, and innovation from outdoor consumer product producers could reduce trail waste. We propose that a baseline value of 0.4 pieces per km should be a waste management target to achieve for all spaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.